Review Article
Print
Review Article
Biofertilizers: A sustainable strategy for enhancing physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil
expand article infoVivek Ghimirey, Jay Chaurasia§, Nobel Acharya, Roshni Dhungana, Sony Chaurasiya§
‡ Agriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan, Nepal
§ Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
Open Access

Abstract

A biofertilizer is a biologically derived substance that can enhance soil fertility. It is beneficial for enhancing soil fertility by introducing microorganisms that produce organic nutrients and perhaps decreasing plant illnesses. An extensive review was done to examine the efficacy of several biofertilizers in improving soil properties, including their physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. The secondary data and material for the article were gathered from a variety of sources, including government reports, published research papers, reports from various organizations, and pertinent websites that were examined and their conclusions presented. Although biofertilizers have proven to be a very sustainable method for improving soil quality and increasing crop output, there is a lack of extensive research on their effects on soil’s physical, chemical, and biological aspects. This study aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of various biofertilizers and their effects. This investigation indicated that biofertilizers such as Nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate solubilizers, and potassium solubilizers help to increase NPK content in the soil leading to an increase in the productivity of soil. Moreover, biofertilizers help to enhance soil physical properties (soil bulk density, soil moisture, soil temperature, and soil color), chemical properties (soil pH, soil nitrogen content, soil phosphorus content, soil potassium content, and soil organic carbon content), and chemical properties (population of bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes). Overall, by overcoming the challenges with biofertilizers in agriculture, we can attain agricultural sustainability.

Keywords

actinomycetes, Biofertilizer, Mycorrhiza, Phosphate Solubilizing bacteria, Sustainability

Introduction

Bio-fertilizers are natural mixtures that include advantageous microorganisms such as mycorrhizal fungi, phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Rao et al. 2014). These microorganisms improve nutrient availability and stimulate soil fertility by developing symbiotic relationships with plants. Biofertilizers, as opposed to chemical fertilizers, support long-term soil health, enhance the soil’s physical, chemical, and biological properties, and lessen their negative environmental effects (Pahalvi et al. 2021). In addition, they increase plant tolerance and serve as an important tool in the fight against pests. To lower resistance and promote long-term advantages, biofertilizers employ techniques of controlling insect pests that are sustainable, affordable, and well-liked in the community (Ghimirey et al. 2024a). Most subsistence and commercial farmers are attracted to the adaptation of biofertilizers rather than solely depend upon synthetic fertilizers (Dhar et al. 2015). To meet the demand for food for the increasing population, it is necessary to enhance production technology. However, with the implementation of enhanced technologies and high-yielding cultivars, the crop becomes vulnerable to many biotic and abiotic pressures, particularly biotic stresses such as diseases (Parajuli et al. 2022; Ghimirey et al. 2024b). Biofertilizers are environmentally friendly which helps in promoting resilient, well-balanced agro-ecosystems.

Biofertilizers are essential for improving different physical characteristics of the soil. By developing symbiotic relationships with plant roots, mycorrhizal fungi improve soil structure, increase water infiltration, lessen erosion, and improve aeration (Thangavel et al. 2022). These fungi also improve soils’ ability to retain water, increasing their drought resistance. Soil compaction is reduced by the actions of biofertilizers, such as earthworms induced by the decomposition of organic matter, which improves root penetration and nutrient absorption (Bashir et al. 2021; Marahatta et al. 2024). Moreover, biofertilizers aid in mineralizing organic matter, which releases vital nutrients and promotes soil nutrient cycling (Basu et al. 2021; Chaurasia et al. 2024b).

Similarly, biofertilizers also enhance soil chemical properties by promoting the nitrogen fixation process (Chaurasia et al. 2024a). Furthermore, by dissolving insoluble phosphates, phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria in biofertilizers increases phosphorus availability (Arif et al. 2017). With the breaking down of organic matter, microbial activity in biofertilizers releases vital nutrients and increases the soil’s nutrient availability. In general, biofertilizers improve cation exchange capacity, which helps retain and exchange essential nutrients (Singh et al. 2016). However, some biofertilizers also affect soil pH by producing organic acids (Patra et al. 2021). Essentially, biofertilizers encourage a balanced, nutrient-rich soil environment, which promotes sustainable agricultural methods and lessens reliance on artificial fertilizers (Bhardwaj et al. 2014).

Moreover, introducing microorganisms like Trichoderma and Bacillus stops the growth of soil-borne pathogens which helps to suppress disease (Guo et al. 2021). Additionally, they aid in the breakdown of organic matter because the microorganisms actively decompose organic residues, releasing vital nutrients and enhancing soil structure. Furthermore, by introducing a range of advantageous microorganisms such as mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, biofertilizers increase microbial diversity and foster a more resilient and dynamic soil microbiome (Odoh et al. 2020). By promoting disease resistance in plants, improved nutrient cycling, and healthy soil, this all-encompassing strategy supports sustainable agricultural methods (Ghimirey et al. 2024c). This study aims to investigate the effects of biofertilizers on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil. There is a considerable knowledge vacuum about biofertilizers, despite the obvious advantages of these fertilizers on soil qualities. Through sustainable means of enhancing soil quality, the present review clarifies the numerous mechanisms that biofertilizers have employed to support plant development, soil health, and protection against various plant infections. This review’s objective is to go over the significant functions and uses of biofertilizers in a variety of fields, such as ecology, soil science, and agriculture.

Methodology

The article is compiled using secondary data and information sourced from government publications, published research papers, reports from various organizations, and relevant websites. The information for this research was collected using a methodical methodology. Electronic sources such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science, Semantic Scholar, Academia, and other relevant websites were utilized to conduct a comprehensive search for existing literature. These sources were thoroughly examined, and the conclusions were succinctly presented.

Results and discussion

Concepts of biofertilizers and their relation to agricultural sustainability

A biofertilizer is a product that contains living microorganisms that have positive effects on the growth and development of plants (Mushtaq et al. 2021). Microbial strains employ diverse mechanisms to optimize nutrient absorption, enhance soil fertility, and boost crop yields. These mechanisms include nitrogen fixation, potassium and phosphorus solubilization, secretion of phytohormones, synthesis of compounds that inhibit phytopathogens, protection against abiotic and biotic stresses, and detoxification of subterranean pollutants (Bhardwaj et al. 2014).

At present, the world population is continuing to grow, and it is projected that by 2050, there will be roughly 9.7 billion individuals inhabiting the planet (Ehrlich and Harte 2015). The rapid expansion is closely linked to the extensive development of industry, cities, and agriculture. Given the increasing global population, traditional agriculture is crucial to fulfilling the nutritional needs of humanity (Chaurasia et al. 2020). It is projected that by 2020, the demand for food grain will reach 321 million tons, and traditional agriculture is necessary to ensure countries can produce enough food to sustain themselves (Gizaki et al. 2015). Conventional agricultural methods primarily rely on the extensive use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides to provide plant nourishment and combat diseases (Van Bruggen et al. 2016). Applying these chemical inputs carefully and thoughtfully has undeniable benefits, not only for enhancing plant growth, crop yield, and quality but also for increasing farmers’ income (Emmanuel et al. 2016). Regrettably, the escalated utilization of synthetic resources may present a significant risk to the ecological system by polluting water, air, and soil (Wassie 2020).

Biofertilizers are a crucial element of organic farming that help maintain a nutrient-rich soil environment (Sinha et al. 2010). When biofertilizers are used as seed or soil inoculants, they undergo multiplication and actively contribute to the nutrient cycle, ultimately enhancing crop productivity (Kumar et al. 2022). Biofertilizers enhance soil fertility through nitrogen fixation from the atmosphere and the solubilization of insoluble phosphates. Additionally, they generate chemicals that promote plant growth inside the soil (Mazid and Khan 2015). Biofertilizers are beneficial in enhancing the growth of several agricultural plants, including rice, pulses, millets, cotton, sugarcane, and vegetable crops (Rashid et al. 2016; Singh et al. 2014).

Nitrogen-fixing bacteria

Nitrogen is the primary limiting nutrient for plant growth. Plants are unable to decrease atmospheric N2, hence they need externally obtained nitrogen for their growth and development (Gupta et al. 2012). The capacity of nitrogen-fixing (NF) bacteria to establish a mutually beneficial connection with leguminous plants and convert atmospheric nitrogen into a usable form has been utilized in agriculture to fulfill the nitrogen needs of these plants as illustrated in Fig. 1 (Sharma et al. 2023). Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms employ an enzyme complex called Nitrogenase to transform atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia (Barney 2020). Nitrogen fixers can be categorized into two groups: symbiotic and non-symbiotic. The Rhizobiaceae family members that form symbiotic associations with leguminous plants are classified as symbiotic organisms (Díez-Méndez and Menéndez 2021). Conversely, non-symbiotic microbes, such as Cyanobacteria, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, etc., exist in both free-living and endophytic forms (Chatterjee et al. 2019). The process of N2 fixation is carried out by the nitrogenase enzyme complex. Dinitrogenase reductase provides the electrons, which dinitrogenase utilizes to convert N2 into NH3 by reduction. Enzymes form a bond with oxygen, which causes them to lose their activity (Mahanty et al. 2017).

Figure 1. 

Schematic diagram representing the process of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Source: Masson-Boivin and Sachs 2018.

Phosphorus solubilizers

Phosphorus is recognized as a crucial resource for the economy, and its reserves are diminishing (Cordell and White 2013). Annually, a total of 16 million metric tons of phosphorus is extracted, primarily from North Africa. This extraction process has challenges associated with transporting the resource across vast distances and dealing with its volatile pricing (Jupp et al. 2021). According to Darwish et al. (2017), it is projected that phosphate rock will be exhausted within 100 years. Simultaneously, the extensive utilization of phosphate fertilizers causes the dissemination of this element in the surroundings, potentially leading to the eutrophication of water reservoirs. Efficient phosphorus management should incorporate recycling, aligning with the principles of a circular economy.

Phosphorus solubilizing biofertilizer (PSB) is applied to enhance the availability and accessibility of phosphorus, hence stimulating the growth and development of plants. PSB, or phospho-bacterin, is a substance that aids in the solubilization of insoluble phosphates such as di- and tri-calcium phosphates, hydroxyapatites, and rock phosphates (Abbey et al. 2019). This process makes these phosphates more easily accessible to plants (Mahdi et al. 2010). The solubilization effect is accomplished through the creation of organic acids by phospho-bacterin, which results in a reduction in soil pH. This, in turn, causes the disintegration of phosphate compounds and the subsequent liberation of abundant phosphorus that may be utilized by plants (Sharma 2002; Glick 2012; Mahanty et al. 2017). The bacteria capable of solubilizing and mobilizing phosphorus (P) include Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhizobium, Burkholderia, Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Microccoccus, Aerobacter, Flavobacterium, Aspergillus, Erwinia as shown in Fig. 2 (Mahdi et al. 2010; Mahanty et al. 2017).

Figure 2. 

Schematic diagram of soil phosphorous mobilization and immobilization by bacteria. Adapted and modified from: Khan et al. 2009.

Potassium solubilisers

Potassium is one of the three fundamental elements that plants require. Potassium (K) plays a crucial role in various biochemical and physiological processes in plants, such as the regulation of stomata (Wang et al. 2013; Hasanuzzaman et al. 2018). Stomata are responsible for controlling the opening and closing of pores in plants. The optimal operation of stomata is crucial for the process of photosynthesis (Falquetto-Gomes et al. 2023).

In the soil system, there are three simultaneous forms of Potassium: unavailable, slowly available, and quickly available forms (Yadav and Sidhu 2016). Applying biofertilizers can aid in remedying this condition by converting the insoluble potassium into soluble forms, making it accessible for plants to absorb as shown in Fig. 3 (Bahadur et al. 2014). For instance, bacteria such as Frateuria aurantia can mobilize and solubilize potassium (K) that is otherwise inaccessible, hence promoting plant growth as reported by Meena et al. (2016).

The Potassium-Solubilizing Microorganisms (KSM) are shown in Table 1. The simultaneous introduction of Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti has a positive impact on grain production and the concentration of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) in Triticum aestivum (Mohammadi and Sohrabi 2012).

Figure 3. 

Direct and indirect mechanisms used by potassium-solubilizing bacteria. Source: Ahmad et al. 2016.

Table 1.

Mechanism used by bacteria for potassium solubilization.

Bacterial strain Mechanism used Source of microorganism References
Sphingomona , Burkholderia Acidification, complexation Oak – mycorrhizosphere Uroz et al. (2007)
B. circulans GY92 Lipo-chitooligosaccharides production Soybean Lian et al. (2001)
B. mucilaginosus Mica through organic acids Sudan grass Basak and Biswas (2009)
B. edaphicus Tartaric acid, oxalic acid Wheat Sheng and He (2006)
B. edaphicus Production of organic acids Cotton and rapeseed Sheng (2005)
B. mucilaginosus Organic acids Pepper and cucumber Supanjani et al. (2006)
B. glathei Siderophores, organic ligands Mycorrhizosphere, bulk soil Calvaruso et al. (2007)
P. glucanolyticus Organic acids Black pepper Sangeeth et al. (2012)
P. mucilaginosus Tartaric, citric, oxalic acids Silicate minerals Liu et al. (2012)
E. hormaechei Organic acids Okra Prajapati et al. (2013)

Effects of biofertilizers on the physical properties of soil

Biofertilizers are essential for improving the physical characteristics of soil and creating a more favorable and fruitful growing environment for plants (Fig. 4). Biofertilizers improve soil structure by encouraging the production of stable soil aggregates, which increase porosity, improve aeration, and increase water infiltration (Kumar et al. 2015). Moreover, the application of biofertilizers improved soil bulk density, soil temperature, and soil moisture (Sharma et al. 2012). Beneficial microbes are added to the soil to aid in the effective cycling of nutrients, increasing the availability of vital nutrients for plants and improving soil fertility in general (Altomare et al. 2011).

Figure 4. 

Schematic diagram representing the effect of biofertilizer on pore space of soil. Source: Chatterjee et al. 2017.

Soil bulk density

Stable soil aggregate development is aided by beneficial microorganisms found in biofertilizers, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungus. By generating pore spaces in the soil, these aggregates increase porosity and decrease bulk density, this leads to a decrease in soil compaction, improving the flow of water and air through the soil profile (Singh et al. 2020). Additionally, the decomposition of organic matter is aided by the activities of these microbes, which raises the soil’s overall organic content (Bhattacharyya et al. 2022). By acting as a binding agent, this organic matter enhances soil structure and lowers bulk density. A progressive increase in soil bulk density is supported by the cumulative effect of using biofertilizers, even though these changes might not be apparent right away.

Soil moisture

By forming stable aggregates and increasing the amount of organic matter in the soil, the use of biofertilizers improves soil structure and increases soil moisture retention. Mycorrhizal fungi, one of the beneficial microorganisms found in biofertilizers, form symbiotic associations with plant roots, encouraging widespread root development that facilitates effective water absorption (Hosseinzadeh et al. 2021). Furthermore, using biofertilizers promotes healthy plant growth by increasing nutrient availability, which helps plants better control water intake (Tahiri et al. 2022). A more favorable environment for long-term plant growth is produced overall by decreased water evaporation, higher water-holding capacity, and enhanced resilience to changes in moisture levels.

Soil temperature

By encouraging stable soil aggregates, increasing aeration, and boosting heat transmission, biofertilizers have an indirect impact on soil temperature. Humus is created as a result of the breakdown of organic matter which is aided by biofertilizers (Wong et al. 2020). Biofertilizers help in the formation of humus which acts as an insulating layer to mitigate extremes in soil temperatures (Khalid et al. 2021). Better root systems, especially those containing mycorrhizal fungi, are encouraged by biofertilizers, which also improve water uptake and help control temperature (Ghorchiani et al. 2018). A more stable and favorable environment for plant growth is produced by the combined influence on soil structure and root development, even when the direct impact on soil temperature is minimal.

Soil color

Since most elements that affect soil color are related to organic matter, drainage, and mineral content, using biofertilizers usually has little direct effect on soil color. However, through their impacts on microbial activity and organic matter content, biofertilizers indirectly contribute to improved soil color. Biofertilizers accelerate the breakdown of organic matter in the soil, which helps humus to develop. A higher humus concentration can give the soil a deep, dark color (Sumathi et al. 2012).

Effects of biofertilizers on the chemical properties of soil

Effect on soil pH

The study found that the application of biofertilizers caused a little decrease in alkalinity and a slight increase in organic carbon content in the soil, compared to soil that was not treated with biofertilizers (Ramalakshmi et al. 2008). Houmani et al. (2015) further suggested that the acidification of the rhizosphere may occur by the release of organic acids via a mechanism involving the extrusion of protons.

Effect on soil nitrogen content

The soil’s nitrogen content was greater in the presence of Azospirillum, Rhizobia, and so on. In their study, Karimi et al. (2018) found that the introduction of Azospirillum bacteria to wheat crops resulted in an increase in soil nitrogen availability due to the fixation of atmospheric nitrogen. Azospirillum is extensively researched as a plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and is often used as a model for studying plant-bacterial interactions (Orozco-Mosqueda et al. 2021). In the past four decades, research on Azospirillum-plant interactions has shown various pathways that illustrate the positive effects of this bacteria on plant growth (Cassán et al. 2020).

Effect on soil phosphorus content

The uptake of phosphorus (P) by plants from the soil is influenced by their roots’ structure and the release of root exudates. Beneficial microorganisms can regulate this process present in the soil (Shen et al. 2011). These microorganisms can dissolve phosphorus, influence the growth and development of roots, and increase phosphorus absorption and other essential nutrients, (Saia et al. 2020). The mycorrhiza and phosphobacteria enhanced the soil’s phosphorus availability. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria can dissolve around 50–60% of bound phosphorus in the soil by releasing organic acids briefly (Goswami et al. 2019). Barra et al. (2019) noticed the enhanced accessibility of soil phosphorus resulting from the introduction of phosphobacteria inoculation.

Effect on soil potassium content

Potassium (K) is a highly prevalent constituent of soil composition, although its limited accessibility significantly constrains both plant development and ecosystem output (Garcia and Zimmermann 2014). The presence of potassium in various components of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus and mycorrhizal root section indicates that the AM fungi can absorb and transport potassium from the soil to the plant root (Zhang et al. 2017). The soil’s potassium content was observed to be elevated in the co-inoculation of Azophos and mycorrhiza (Ramalakshmi et al. 2008).

Effect on soil organic carbon content

Soil carbon is an essential element of operational ecosystems and vital for ensuring the security of food, soil, water, and energy (Stockmann et al. 2015). The presence of beneficial microbes had a notable impact on the amount of organic carbon in the soil. Specifically, applying Trichoderma to the soil resulted in a greater increase in organic carbon content compared to inoculating the seeds with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in soybean and maize (Imran et al. 2021). Bio-fertilizers have shown significant effects on chemical properties of soil (Heydari et al. 2020).

Effects of biofertilizers on the biological properties of soil

Biofertilizers are essential for improving the biological qualities of soil because they introduce beneficial microbes that aid in nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and nutrient cycling. These microbes boost microbial diversity, promote disease suppression, and improve soil structure (Xiong et al. 2017). Biofertilizers lessen their influence on the environment, increase soil fertility over the long term, and encourage sustainable agriculture practices (Rashid et al. 2016). Overall, they support higher crop yields, a more sustainable farming method, and a better soil environment.

bacteria

The impact of biofertilizers on soil microbes is complex (Sharma et al. 2012). Beneficial microorganisms like phosphate-solubilizing and nitrogen-fixing bacteria can be found in biofertilizers, which can directly increase their population and activity and increase the availability of nutrients for plants (Timofeeva et al. 2022). Furthermore, biofertilizers reduce harmful bacteria and promote a better soil ecology by increasing the diversity of soil microorganisms.

fungi

Using biofertilizers has various effects on soil fungi, depending on the particular micro-organisms included in the fertilizer. Biofertilizers can enhance nutrient intake by fostering favorable symbiotic connections with plant roots, particularly those that contain mycorrhizal fungus (Filho et al. 2017). Certain biofertilizers have the potential to impact soil fungal communities by augmenting the number of microbial populations and modifying the dynamics of resource competition (Trabelsi and Mhamdi 2013). Specific formulations containing antagonistic microorganisms aid in suppressing soil-borne diseases, whereas formulations high in organic matter might hasten decomposition and include several fungi in the cycling of nutrients (Pathma et al. 2019).

actinomycetes

Because biofertilizers frequently contain strains or nutrients that favor the development of these filamentous bacteria, their use can greatly benefit soil actinomycetes through direct growth promotion (Li et al. 2022). Increased antagonistic activities may result from this, especially in biofertilizers containing antagonistic bacteria like Streptomyces species, which reduce soil-borne diseases by producing antibiotics (Roopa and Gadag 2019). Furthermore, organic matter-rich biofertilizers promote actinomycetes’ ability to break down complex organic compounds, which aids in the cycling of nutrients.

Challenges with biofertilizers

Despite the increasing popularity of using beneficial soil microorganisms in biofertilizers to improve plant productivity, widespread adoption on a large scale has been limited due to the challenge of replicating their positive impact on plants in natural environments with varying conditions (Ibáñez et al. 2023). The primary obstacles to the implementation of microbial biofertilizer include a limited understanding of the ecological significance of microbial biofertilizer among farming communities, insufficient efforts by agricultural extension workers to promote and motivate farmers to use biofertilizer products, a scarcity of appropriate carriers for biofertilizer formulation, inadequate storage facilities to prevent contamination of biofertilizer products, and the adverse effects of extreme climatic conditions, which result in inconsistent effectiveness of biofertilizers on plant productivity in natural environments (Gautam et al. 2021). Moreover, the application of biofertilizer products can lose credibility due to insufficient labeling, such as the absence of an expiry date and the omission of the names of the microorganisms utilized in the creation of the biofertilizer (Narayanasamy 2013). Additionally, it is important to note that most biofertilizers exhibit selectivity in their effects (Malusà et al. 2016).

Conclusion

Biofertilizers offer a sustainable solution for enhancing soil quality and promoting long-term soil sustainability by improving its physical, chemical, and biological properties. They reduce the necessity for artificial fertilizers by improving the variety of microorganisms, the accessibility of nutrients, and the structure of the soil. To achieve widespread application, it is necessary to address challenges such as crop-specific characteristics, limited shelf life, compatibility with existing procedures, and sensitivity to the environment. To be able to surmount these challenges and fully exploit the capabilities of biofertilizers in promoting robust and sustainable agricultural ecosystems, it is imperative to persist with research and teaching.

Conflict of interest

The authors hereby declare that they possess no conflict of interest in this paper.

Data availability statement

The data will be available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The author confirm that they have adhered to the ethical policy of the journal.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge IAAS and AFU professors for their immense support.

References

  • Aasfar A, Bargaz A, Yaakoubi K, Hilali A, Meftah Kadmiri I (2021) Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Frontiers in microbiology 12: 628379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379
  • Abbey L, Abbey J, Leke‐Aladekoba A, Iheshiulo EM, Ijenyo M (2019) Biopesticides and biofertilizers: types, production, benefits, and utilization. In: Simpson BK, Aryee ANA, Toldrá F (Eds) Byproducts from Agriculture and Fisheries: Adding Value for Food, Feed, Pharma, and Fuels. Wiley, New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119383956.ch20
  • Ahmad M, Nadeem SM, Naveed M, Zahir ZA (2016) Potassium-solubilizing bacteria and their application in agriculture. In: Meena V, Maurya B, Verma J, Meena R (Eds) Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New Delhi, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_21
  • Altomare C, Tringovska I (2011) Beneficial soil microorganisms, an ecological alternative for soil fertility management. In: Lichtfouse, E (Ed.) Genetics, biofuels and local farming systems. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1521-9_6
  • Arif MS, Shahzad SM, Yasmeen T, Riaz M, Ashraf M, Ashraf MA, Mubarik MS, Kausar R (2017) Improving plant phosphorus (P) acquisition by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. In: Naeem M, Ansari A, Gill S (Eds) Essential Plant Nutrients: Uptake, Use Efficiency, and Management, 513–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58841-4_21
  • Bahadur I, Meena VS, Kumar S (2014) Importance and application of potassic biofertilizer in Indian agriculture. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3(12): 80–85.
  • Barney BM (2020) Aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria for hydrogen and ammonium production: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 104(4): 1383–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10210-9
  • Barra PJ, Pontigo S, Delgado M, Parra-Almuna L, Duran P, Valentine AJ, Jorquera MA, de la Luz Mora M (2019) Phosphobacteria inoculation enhances the benefit of P–fertilization on Lolium perenne in soils contrasting in P–availability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 136: 107516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.06.012
  • Basak BB, Biswas DR (2009) Influence of potassium solubilizing microorganism (Bacillus mucilaginosus) and waste mica on potassium uptake dynamics by sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) grown under two Alfisols. Plant and Soil 317: 235–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9805-z
  • Bashir O, Ali T, Baba ZA, Rather GH, Bangroo SA, Mukhtar SD, Naik N, Mohiuddin R, Bharati V, Bhat RA (2021) Soil organic matter and its impact on soil properties and nutrient status. In: Dar GH, Bhat RA, Mehmood MA, Hakeem KR (Eds) Microbiota and biofertilizers: Ecofriendly tools for reclamation of degraded soil environs, Vol 2, 129–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_7
  • Basu S, Kumar G, Chhabra S, Prasad R (2021) Role of soil microbes in biogeochemical cycle for enhancing soil fertility. In: Verma JP, Macdonald CA, Gupta VK, Podile AR (Eds) New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, Netherlands, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64325-4.00013-4
  • Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microbial Cell Factories 13: 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-66
  • Bhattacharyya SS, Ros GH, Furtak K, Iqbal HM, Parra-Saldívar R (2022) Soil carbon sequestration–An interplay between soil microbial community and soil organic matter dynamics. Science of The Total Environment 815: 152928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152928
  • Brodribb TJ, Sussmilch F, McAdam SA (2020) From reproduction to production, stomata are the master regulators. The Plant Journal 101(4): 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14561
  • Calvaruso C, Turpault MP, Leclerc E, Frey-Klett P (2007) Impact of ectomycorrhizosphere on the functional diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities from a forest stand in relation to nutrient mobilization processes. Microbial Ecology 54: 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9260-z
  • Cassán F, Coniglio A, López G, Molina R, Nievas S, de Carlan CL, Donadio F, Torres D, Rosas S, Pedrosa FO, de Souza E (2020) Everything you must know about Azospirillum and its impact on agriculture and beyond. Biology and Fertility of Soils 56: 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-020-01463-y
  • Chatterjee A, Shankar A, Singh S, Kesari V, Rai R, Patel AK, Rai LC (2019) Beneficial microorganisms and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Fujita M, Oku H, Islam T (Eds) Approaches for Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. CRC Press, 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351104722-27
  • Chatterjee A, Singh S, Agrawal C, Yadav S, Rai R, Rai LC (2017) Role of algae as a biofertilizer. In: Rastogi RP, Madamwar D, Pandey A (Eds) Algal green chemistry. Elsevier, Netherlands, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63784-0.00010-2
  • Chaurasia J, Ghimirey V, Marahatta S (2024b) Understanding the impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: soil, environment, and human health. Environment & Ecosystem Science 8(2): 43–46.
  • Chaurasia J, Parajuli M, Khadka GB (2020) Changing approach to food self-sufficiency on the scenario of the pandemic “Covid 19”. Environment and Ecosystem Science 4(1): 43–46. https://doi.org/10.26480/ees.01.2020.43.46
  • Chaurasia J, Poudel B, Mandal T, Acharya N, Ghimirey V (2024a) Effect of micronutrients, rhizobium, salicylic acid, and effective microorganisms in plant growth and yield characteristics of green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] in Rupandehi, Nepal. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26821
  • Darwish M, Aris A, Puteh MH, Jusoh MN, Kadir AA (2017) Waste bones ash as an alternative source of P for struvite precipitation. Journal of Environmental Management 203: 861–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.033
  • Dębska B, Długosz J, Piotrowska-Długosz A, Banach-Szott M (2016) The impact of a bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration—results from a field-scale study. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16: 2335–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1430-5
  • Dhar DW, Prasanna R, Pabbi S, Vishwakarma R (2015) Significance of cyanobacteria as inoculants in agriculture. In: Das D (Ed.) Algal Biorefinery: An Integrated Approach, Springer, Cham, 339–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22813-6_16
  • Díez-Méndez A, Menéndez E (2021) Rhizobium presence and functions in microbiomes of non-leguminous plants. In: Shrivastava N, Mahajan S, Varma A (Eds) Symbiotic Soil Microorganisms. Soil Biology, vol 60. Springer, Cham, 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51916-2_16
  • Emmanuel D, Owusu-Sekyere E, Owusu V, Jordaan H (2016) Impact of agricultural extension service on adoption of chemical fertilizer: Implications for rice productivity and development in Ghana. Journal of Life Sciences 79: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.10.002
  • Falquetto-Gomes P, Silva WJ, Siqueira JA, Araújo WL, Nunes-Nesi A (2023) From epidermal cells to functional pores: Understanding stomatal development. Journal of Plant Physiology 292: 154163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154163
  • Filho JA, Sobrinho RR, Pascholati SF (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and its role in plant nutrition in sustainable agriculture. In: Meena V, Mishra P, Bisht J, Pattanayak A (Eds) Agriculturally Important Microbes for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Singapore 2, 129–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5343-6_5
  • Gautam K, Sirohi C, Singh NR, Thakur Y, Jatav SS, Rana K, Chitara M, Meena RP, Singh AK, Parihar M (2021) Microbial biofertilizer: Types, applications, and current challenges for sustainable agricultural production. In Biofertilizers. Woodhead Publishing, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821667-5.00014-2
  • Ghimirey V, Chaurasia J, Acharya N (2024a) Major Pest of Mango and Management Practice at Farmer Level in Saptari. Agriculture Extension in Developing Countries, 70–75.
  • Ghimirey V, Chaurasia J, Acharya N, Dhungana R, Marahatta S (2024c) Nurturing Earth’s Foundation: A Comprehensive Review of Soil Conservation Strategies, Challenges and Solutions. AgroEnvironmental Sustainability.
  • Ghimirey V, Chaurasia J, Marahatta S (2024b) Plant nutrition disorders: Insights from clinic analyses and their impact on plant health. Agriculture Extension in Developing Countries 2(1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.26480/aedc.02.2023.89.94
  • Ghorchiani M, Etesami H, Alikhani HA (2018) Improvement of growth and yield of maize under water stress by co-inoculating an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium together with phosphate fertilizers. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 258: 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.016
  • Gizaki LJ, Alege AA, Iwuchukwu JC (2015) Farmer’s perception of sustainable alternatives to the use of chemical fertilizers to enhance crop yield in Bauchi state Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology 1(5): 242–250.
  • Goswami SP, Maurya BR, Dubey AN, Singh NK (2019) Role of phosphorus solubilizing microorganisms and dissolution of insoluble phosphorus in soil. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7(3): 3905–3913.
  • Guo Y, Fan Z, Yi X, Zhang Y, Khan RA, Zhou Z (2021) Sustainable management of soil-borne bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum in vitro and in vivo through fungal metabolites of different Trichoderma spp. Sustainability 13(3): 1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031491
  • Han HS, Lee KD (2006) Effect of co-inoculation with phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria on mineral uptake and growth of pepper and cucumber. Plant Soil and Environment 52(3): 130. https://doi.org/10.17221/3356-PSE
  • Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MB, Nahar K, Hossain MS, Mahmud JA, Hossen MS, Masud AA, Moumita Fujita M (2018) Potassium: a vital regulator of plant responses and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Agronomy 8(3): 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8030031
  • Heydari L, Bayat H, Hamzei J (2020) Short-term effects of bio-fertilizers application on some soil physical and chemical properties. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation 27(1): 71–89. https://doi.org/10.22069/jwsc.2020.16986.3238
  • Hosseinzadeh MH, Ghalavand A, Boojar MM, Modarres-Sanavy SA, Mokhtassi-Bidgoli A (2021) Application of manure and biofertilizer to improve soil properties and increase grain yield, essential oil and ω3 of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) under drought stress. Soil and Tillage Research 205: 104633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104633
  • Houmani H, Rabhi M, Abdelly C, Debez A (2015) Implication of rhizosphere acidification in nutrient uptake by plants: Cases of potassium (K), phosphorus (P), and iron (Fe). In: Hakeem K (Ed.) Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues. Springer, Cham, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_4
  • Imran Amanullaha, Al Tawaha ARM (2021) Management of nano-black carbon, phosphorous and bio fertilizer improve soil organic carbon and ensilage biomass of soybean and maize. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 52(22): 2837–2851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.1966439
  • Jupp AR, Beijer S, Narain GC, Schipper W, Slootweg JC (2021) Phosphorus recovery and recycling–closing the loop. Chemical Society Reviews 50(1): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01150A
  • Khalid S, Arif M, Fahad S, Al-Tawaha ARM (2021) Bio Fertilizer as a Tool for Soil Fertility Management in a Changing Climate. In: Fahad S, Sonmez O, Saud S, Wang D, Wu C, Adnan M, Turan V (Eds) Sustainable Soil and Land Management and Climate Change. CRC Press, 165–177.
  • Khan AA, Jilani G, Akhtar MS, Naqvi SM, Rasheed M (2009) Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: occurrence, mechanisms and their role in crop production. Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 1(1): 48–58.
  • Kumar D, Purakayastha TJ, Shivay YS (2015) Long-term effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on physical and chemical properties of soil and productivity of rice-wheat system. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 6(Apr, 2): 176–181. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4038.2015.00030.5
  • Kumar S, Sindhu SS, Kumar R (2022) Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Current Research in Microbial Sciences 3: 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094
  • Li Y, Li H, Han X, Han G, Xi J, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Xue Q, Guo Q, Lai H (2022) Actinobacterial biofertilizer improves the yields of different plants and alters the assembly processes of rhizosphere microbial communities. Applied Soil Ecology 171: 104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104345
  • Lian B, Prithiviraj B, Souleimanov A, Smith DL (2001) Evidence for the production of chemical compounds analogous to nod factor by the silicate bacterium Bacillus circulans GY92. Microbiological Research 156(3): 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-5013-00107
  • Mahanty T, Bhattacharjee S, Goswami M, Bhattacharyya P, Das B, Ghosh A, Tribedi P (2017) Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 3315–3335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8104-0
  • Mahdi SS, Hassan GI, Samoon SA, Rather HA, Dar SA, Zehra B (2010) Bio-fertilizers in organic agriculture. Journal of Phytology 2(10): 42–54.
  • Malusà E, Pinzari F, Canfora L (2016) Efficacy of biofertilizers: challenges to improve crop production. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity: Functional Applications 2: 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2644-4_2
  • Marahatta S, Chaurasia J, Ghimirey V, Dahal SR (2024) Beneath the surface: Earthworms and their beneficial impacts on farming communities. Reviews In Food And Agriculture 5(1): 06–12.
  • Mertens T, Hess D (1984) Yield increases in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum under greenhouse and field conditions of a temperate region. Plant and soil 82: 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220773
  • Mitter EK, Tosi M, Obregón D, Dunfield KE, Germida JJ (2021) Rethinking crop nutrition in times of modern microbiology: innovative biofertilizer technologies. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5: 606815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.606815
  • Mohammadi K, Heidari G, Khalesro S, Sohrabi Y (2011) Soil management, microorganisms and organic matter interactions: A review. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(86): 19840. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBX11.006
  • Mohammadi K, Sohrabi Y (2012) Bacterial biofertilizers for sustainable crop production: a review. ARPN Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 7(5): 307–316.
  • Mushtaq Z, Faizan S, Hussain A (2021) Role of microorganisms as biofertilizers. In: Hakeem KR, Dar GH, Mehmood MA, Bhat RA (Eds) Microbiota and Biofertilizers: A Sustainable Continuum for Plant and Soil Health, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48771-3_6
  • Odoh CK, Sam K, Zabbey N, Eze CN, Nwankwegu AS, Laku C, Dumpe BB (2020) Microbial consortium as biofertilizers for crops growing under the extreme habitats. In: Yadav A, Singh J, Rastegari A, Yadav N (Eds) Plant Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, vol 25, Springer, Cham, 381–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38453-1_13
  • Orozco-Mosqueda MdC, Flores A, Rojas-Sánchez B, Urtis-Flores CA, Morales-Cedeño LR, Valencia-Marin MF, Chávez-Avila S, Rojas-Solis D, Santoyo G (2021) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as bioinoculants: attributes and challenges for sustainable crop improvement. Agronomy 11(6): 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061167
  • Pahalvi HN, Rafiya L, Rashid S, Nisar B, Kamili AN (2021) Chemical fertilizers and their impact on soil health. In: Dar GH, Bhat RA, Mehmood MA, Hakeem KR (Eds) Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Vol 2, Springer, Cham, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_1
  • Parajuli M, Khadka GB, Chaurasia J (2022) A review on comparative effect of chemicals and botanicals in management of brown spot diseases of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science 7(1): 127–131. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2022.0701018
  • Pathma J, Raman G, Sakthivel N (2019) Microbiome of rhizospheric soil and vermicompost and their applications in soil fertility, pest and pathogen management for sustainable agriculture. In: Panpatte D, Jhala Y (Eds) Soil Fertility Management for Sustainable Development. Springer, Singapore, 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5904-0_9
  • Patra A, Sharma VK, Nath DJ, Ghosh A, Purakayastha TJ, Barman M, Kumar S, Chobhe KA, Anil AS, Rekwar RK (2021) Impact of soil acidity influenced by long-term integrated use of enriched compost, biofertilizers, and fertilizer on soil microbial activity and biomass in rice under acidic soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 21: 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00398-5
  • Prajapati K, Sharma MC, Modi HA (2013) Growth promoting effect of potassium solubilizing microorganisms on Abelmoscus esculantus. International Journal of Agricultural Science 3(1): 181–188.
  • Rao KM, Singh PK, Ryingkhun HB, Maying B (2014) Use of bio-fertilizers in vegetable production. Indian Horticulture Journal 4(1): 73–76.
  • Roopa KP, Gadag AS (2019) Management of soil-borne diseases of plants through some cultural practices and actinobacteria. In: Ansari R, Mahmood I (Eds) Plant Health Under Biotic Stress. Springer, Singapore, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6043-5_7
  • Saia S, Aissa E, Luziatelli F, Ruzzi M, Colla G, Ficca AG, Cardarelli M, Rouphael Y (2020) Growth-promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially benefit tomato and corn depending upon the supplied form of phosphorus. Mycorrhiza 30: 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00927-w
  • Sangeeth KP, Bhai RS, Srinivasan V (2012) Paenibacillus glucanolyticus, a promising potassium solubilizing bacterium isolated from black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) rhizosphere. Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops 21(2): 118–124.
  • Sharma AK (2002) Biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Agrobios, Jodhpur, India, 12: 319–324.
  • Sharma P, Sangwan S, Kaur H, Patra A, Anamika Mehta S (2023) Diversity and evolution of nitrogen fixing bacteria. In: Singh N, Chattopadhyay A, Lichtfouse E (Eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 60. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 60, Springer, Cham, 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24181-9_5
  • Sharma S, Gupta R, Dugar G, Srivastava AK (2012) Impact of application of biofertilizers on soil structure and resident microbial community structure and function. In: Maheshwari D (Ed.) bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Probiotics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27515-9_4
  • Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X, Zhang W, Zhang F (2011) Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiology 156(3): 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175232
  • Sheng XF (2005) Growth promotion and increased potassium uptake of cotton and rape by a potassium releasing strain of Bacillus edaphicus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37(10): 1918–1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.026
  • Sheng XF, He LY (2006) Solubilization of potassium-bearing minerals by a wild-type strain of Bacillus edaphicus and its mutants and increased potassium uptake by wheat. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 52(1): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1139/w05-117
  • Singh M, Dotaniya ML, Mishra A, Dotaniya CK, Regar KL, Lata M (2016) Role of biofertilizers in conservation agriculture. In: Bisht J, Meena V, Mishra P, Pattanayak A (Eds) Conservation Agriculture. Springer, Singapore, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_4
  • Singh SS, Singh BK, Yadav SM, Gupta AK (2014) Potential of biofertilizers in crop production in Indian agriculture. American Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization Technology 4(2): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpnft.2014.33.40
  • Singh TB, Ali A, Prasad M, Yadav A, Shrivastav P, Goyal D, Dantu PK (2020) Role of organic fertilizers in improving soil fertility. In: Naeem M, Ansari A, Gill S (Eds) Contaminants in Agriculture. Springer, Cham, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41552-5_3
  • Sinha RK, Valani D, Chauhan K, Agarwal S (2010) Embarking on a second green revolution for sustainable agriculture by vermiculture biotechnology using earthworms: reviving the dreams of Sir Charles Darwin. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development 2(7): 113.
  • Stockmann U, Padarian J, McBratney A, Minasny B, de Brogniez D, Montanarella L, Hong SY, Rawlins BG, Field DJ (2015) Global soil organic carbon assessment. Global Food Security 6: 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.07.001
  • Sumathi T, Janardhan A, Srilakhmi A, Gopal DS, Narasimha G (2012) Impact of indigenous microorganisms on soil microbial and enzyme activities. Archives of Applied Science Research 4(2): 1065–1073.
  • Supanjani S, Han HyoShim HH, Jung JaeSung JJ, Lee KyungDong LK (2006) Rock phosphate-potassium and rock-solubilising bacteria as alternative, sustainable fertilizers. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Agronomy 26(4): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2006020
  • Tahiri AI, Meddich A, Raklami A, Alahmad A, Bechtaoui N, Anli M, Göttfert M, Heulin T, Achouak W, Oufdou K (2022) Assessing the potential role of compost, PGPR, and AMF in improving tomato plant growth, yield, fruit quality, and water stress tolerance. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 22: 743–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00684-w
  • Thangavel P, Anjum NA, Muthukumar T, Sridevi G, Vasudhevan P, Maruthupandian A (2022) Arbuscular mycorrhizae: natural modulators of plant–nutrient relation and growth in stressful environments. Archives of Microbiology 204(5): 264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-02882-1
  • Timofeeva A, Galyamova M, Sedykh S (2022) Prospects for using phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms as natural fertilizers in agriculture. Plants 11(16): 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162119
  • Trabelsi D, Mhamdi R (2013) Microbial inoculants and their impact on soil microbial communities: a review. BioMed Research International 2013(1): 863240. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/863240
  • Uroz S, Calvaruso C, Turpault MP, Pierrat JC, Mustin C, Frey-Klett P (2007) Effect of the mycorrhizosphere on the genotypic and metabolic diversity of the bacterial communities involved in mineral weathering in a forest soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73(9): 3019–3027. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00121-07
  • Van Bruggen AH, Gamliel A, Finckh MR (2016) Plant disease management in organic farming systems. Pest Management Science 72(1): 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4145
  • Wang M, Zheng Q, Shen Q, Guo S (2013) The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14(4): 7370–7390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14047370
  • Wong WS, Zhong HT, Cross AT, Yong JW (2020) Plant biostimulants in vermicomposts: Characteristics and plausible mechanisms. In: Geelen D, Xu L (Eds) The Chemical Biology of Plant Biostimulants, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119357254.ch6
  • Xiong W, Guo S, Jousset A, Zhao Q, Wu H, Li R, Kowalchuk GA, Shen Q (2017) Bio-fertilizer application induces soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease by reshaping the soil microbiome. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 114: 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.016
  • Yadav BK, Sidhu AS (2016) Dynamics of potassium and their bioavailability for plant nutrition. In: Meena V, Maurya B, Verma J, Meena R (Eds) Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, New Delhi, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_14
  • Zhang H, Wei S (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis increased potassium content and expression of genes encoding potassium channels in Lycium barbarum. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 254985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00440
login to comment