Research Article
Print
Research Article
Bio-effectiveness of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. seed extracts against Colletotrichum capsici (Syd.) Butler & Bisby causal agent of anthracnose in cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walps.) under natural conditions
expand article infoTize Tize, Patrice Zemko Ngatsi, Sylvère Landry Lontsi Dida, Apollinaire Njome Toka, Thierry Songwe Atindo, Eric Biyo’a Ndongo, Charles Sale Essome, Bekolo Ndongo
‡ University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
Open Access

Abstract

Anthracnose disease is one of the major causes of yield losses around 45 to 85% in cowpea crops production in Cameroon. Synthetic fungicides are commonly used for diseases management, yet concerns exist regarding their cost effectiveness and environmental impact. This study aimed to control the development of cowpea anthracnose by using extracts from the seeds of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. The experimental design was a “split-plot” with four replicates. The varieties constituting the main plots randomly in replication with two variants: V1 (Tiligré) and V2 (Lori 24-130) and treatments represented sub-plots randomized within the main plot (T0: control; T-AqE: aqueous extract; T-AcE: acetone extract; T-ME: methanol extract; T-Fong: synthetic fungicide containing 80% of maneb) during two campaigns (2020 and 2021). As results, the plots treated with synthetic fungicide T-F: (9.78 and 9.1%), aqueous extracts (10.6 and 20.48%) and acetone extracts (12.2 and 12.3%) recorded lower severity than control plots (64.14 and 59.82%) for varieties V1 and V2, respectively. The yields were higher in plots treated with aqueous extract (794.05 and 926.63 kg ha-1) and lower in the control plots (518.03 and 545.055 kg ha-1) respectively for the varieties V1 and V2. Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) seed extracts could be used in the integrated control of cowpea anthracnose disease.

Keywords

Vigna unguiculata, Biopesticide, Balanites aegyptiaca, Colletotrichum capsici

Introduction

Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata [L] Walp., is one of the most widely grown grain legumes in all hot, zones, arid and semi-arid zones of sub-Saharan Africa where other crops can fail, due to their poor adaptation to drought, high temperatures and poor soils (Lalsaga and Drabo 2017; Hamidou et al. 2018). The species V. unguiculata plays an important role in food security, as cowpea is used in human and animal food. It constitutes an important income resource for producers, thanks to the marketing of seeds and tops (Remond and Walrand 2017). This legume is an excellent source of protein (23 to 25% on average), carbohydrates (64%), and dietary fiber. Other nutrients such as thiamin, niacin and riboflavin are present in grain (Jackson 2009; Modu and al. 2010). In addition, cowpea provides the human diet with the content of its proteins in essential amino acids such as lysine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, valine, threonine and methionine (USDA 2004; Neya et al. 2019). Agronomically, cowpea is well known for its ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen up to 240 kg/ha, thanks to a symbiotic association with bacteria of the genus Rhizobium sp., which are found in the nodules of its roots and contributes to improving soil fertility (Kaboré 2004; Husson et al. 2010).

Despite the multiple roles played by this legume, cowpea cultivation is faced with numerous biotic (pathogenic diseases, weeds, insect pests) and abiotic (drought due to very high temperatures, poor soils, very unfavorable sowing dates) problems (Hartman and Leandro 2015; Maimouna et al. 2020). Cowpea production is low, due to attacks by fungal, bacterial, viral and nematological diseases which attack different parts of the plant at all stages of its growth. Among the fungal diseases, anthrachnose, caused by Colletotrichum capsici (Syd.) Butler & Bisby. is the most devastating, with a yield loss of up to 85% during periods of high humidity (Alabi 1994).

Faced with these biotic constraints, producers apply synthetic chemical pesticides for their effectiveness. But these chemicals have harmful consequences on the environment, human and animal health (Adam et al. 2010). Bio-pesticides can provide an alternative, as they have the advantage of being locally available, biodegradable, and having low toxicity for humans and the environment (Faye 2010; Elfeel and Warrag 2011; Sane et al. 2018; Traoré et al. 2019). Like most plant products with a biopesticidal effect, the antiparasitic activity of the bark, roots and seed extracts of Balanites aegyptiaca has already been the subject of numerous studies, which have identified insecticidal, fungicides, antimicrobial, vermicides and vermicidal, and faciolicidal (Dwivedi et al. 2009; Al Ashaal et al. 2010; Emad et al. 2012; Elamin and Satti 2013; Haruna et al. 2020; Toka et al. 2023). The objective of this work was to control the development of cowpea anthracnose by using extracts from the seeds of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del.

Material and methods

Study site

The field trials were carried out in the locality of Akonolinga, located in agro-ecological zone V of Cameroon (forest zone with bimodal rainfall). The geographical coordinates of the site recorded using a GPS (Garmin model Etrex Legend HCX) are: 03°48.136'N, 012°15.518'E, for an average altitude of 671 m (accuracy of ± 3 m). The site was left fallow for four years with the previous crops: cassava, peanuts, cocoyam and plantain. The climate of Akonolinga is a sub-equatorial climate of the Congo-Guinean type, with two dry seasons alternating with two rainy seasons. The average rainfall is 1633 mm/year, divided into a major rainy season, from March to June, and a short rainy season, from September to November. The average annual temperature is relatively constant, around 23 to 27 °C. The average annual humidity is around 80%. The soil belongs to the group of ferralitic soils of acidic, lateritic, sandy loam and marshy rocks. It is characterized by outcrops of the hardened horizon in the form of slabs or gravel, which sterilize large areas of land (Moudingo 2007).

Plant material

The plant material consists of the seeds of two improved cowpea varieties. The V1 variety: Tiligré (KVX-775-33-2G), whose development cycle is 70 days, and the V2 variety (Niébé Lori 24-130), very resistant to attacks by insect pests, supplied by Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD) of Maroua and the choice of these varieties is linked to their good yield potential (1500–2000 kg ha-1) (Ouedraogo et al. 2011). As a biopesticide plant, the seeds of Balanites aegyptiaca (almonds) were used for the tests.

Experimental design

The split-plot experimental design with four replicates was used with two varieties constituting the main plots randomly in replication (V1: Tiligré) and V2: Lori 24-130) and five treatments represented sub-plots randomized within the main plot (T0: control; T-AqE: aqueous extract; T-AcE: acetone extract; T-ME: methanol extract; T-Fong: synthetic fungicide containing 80% of maneb). Each block is composed of 10 sub-plots, for a total of 40 experimental units. The experimental units, which measure approximately 3 m × 2 m, are separated from each other by paths of 0.5 m. The blocks, for their part, are 1 m apart from each other. Each experimental unit was made up of 3 rows, sown with a spacing of 80 cm × 40 cm, three seeds per plot (Lalsba and Drabo 2017; Traoré et al. 2019). The experimental design was spread over an area of 400 m2.

Preparation of treatments

The aqueous extract of Balanites aegyptiaca was prepared according to the method proposed by Zhang et al. (2018). The mature fruits are collected under the desert date tree. They were freed of their epicarps and mesocarps by soaking in water. After drying in the sun, the fruits containing the endocarp were crushed manually using a hammer against a stone to obtain the kernels. Using an electric mill, the almonds were crushed, and 500 g of almond powder were weighed using a precision balance from the “Sartoruis Ag Gottinguen” brand and macerated in 5 L of water for at least 24 hours (Gayathri and Sahu 2015). After filtration using a muslin cloth, the solution obtained with a concentration of 100 g L-1 was poured into a 15 L backpack sprayer, to which 10 g of powdered soap was added as a wetting agent, to reinforce the adhesion of the products to the parts of the plant to be treated and limiting their leaching by rainwater. The mixture thus obtained is ready for the treatment of the 8 sub-plots concerned for this extract. The preparation of organic extracts was made by maceration of the almond powder of Balanites aegyptiaca seeds, at a rate of 500 g in 2 L (concentration: 250 g L-1) of Acetone and Methanol at 70 °C for 48 hours. The products obtained were filtered using filter paper and concentrated in a Rota-vapor (Büchi R-200 Rotary Evaporator at 60 °C), until the essential oils were obtained. The extracts obtained were placed in a desiccator to eliminate the remaining solvent. Subsequently, they were weighed and stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C until use (Gata-Gonçalves et al. 2003). Balanites aegyptiaca seed extracts were diluted at a rate of seven (7) mL for 1 L of water, 35 mL for 5 L of water to treat the 8 sub-plots concerned (Dabiré-Binso et al. 2008). Fungicide with active ingredient 80% Maneb was used following the dose recommended by the manufacturer 3.33 g L-1. The fungicide Plantineb 720 WP with active ingredient 80% Maneb was used.

Pathogen identification

The identification of pure isolate was made by observing the cultural and microscopic characteristic of Colletotrichum capsici and his comparison to a reference C. capsici isolate. In culture on PDA culture medium, C. capsici has a gray mycelial mass characterized by an absence of sclerotia. Under the microscope, the acervuli are made up of conidiophores producing conidia and numerous long, black brown to black bristles protruding from the conidial mass. The conidia are unicellular, hyaline, fusoid with rounded and slightly hooked ends, most often falcate. The identification key r described by Sérémé et al. (2001) was used.

Disease incidence and severity measurement

Incidence is the proportion of diseased plants within a given experimental unit, independently of the severity of the attack on each plant; the number of plants attacked by diseases out of the total number of plants in the plot. The incidence is evaluated every two weeks interval from the first week of application of the treatments, on the 10 plants labeled randomly in each experimental unit (leaves, stems, pods) (Aroga 2007). The incidence is determined according to the formula of Tchoumakov and Zaharova (1990).

I(%)=Npa×100Npt

Where I (%) : is the incidence of diseases in the plot expressed as a percentage, Npa: is the number of plants attacked by diseases in the plot and Npt the total number of plants in the plot.

Severity of disease on pods

Severity is the degree to which an organ or entire plant is attacked by a disease. Severity is assessed visually every two weeks interval as soon as the first symptoms of the disease appear, on the 10 plants randomly labeled in each experimental unit (leaves, stems, pods). (Aroga 2007). Severity is determined using the formula proposed by Tchoumakov and Zaharova (1990).

S(%)=(ab)N×100

Where: S (%) is the severity, is the sum of the products of the number of diseased or attacked plants (a) by the degree of infection (b) given in % and N is the number of sick or attacked plants.

Evaluation of the effect of different extracts of Balanites aegyptiaca seeds on yield

The production parameters are measured considering the number of mature pods at 80 days after sowing (DAS) for the 2 varieties of cowpea per labeled plant and per experimental unit of each block. The grains obtained after shelling the pods were dried and weighed, then the weight was determined in each elementary plot according to the treatments and varieties. The values obtained were subsequently estimated per hectare using the formula from Zakari (2003).

Yeildkg/ha=weight/plot (g)Surface parcellaire(m2)×10000m21ha×1kg1000g

Statistical analysis

The data from field observations were subjected to one-way and two-way ANOVA using R software version 4.0.1. Then multiple comparisons of means were determined on data, and the Tukey test was used to separate them when the analysis of variance was significant. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster were performed using RStudio interface between varieties, treatments, epidemiological parameters (incidence and severity), and yield, with a view to detecting the correlation between varieties and treatments less susceptible to anthracnose.

Results

Morphological characterization of Colletotrichum capsici isolate

In PDA medium, C. capsici has a gray mycelial mass characterized by an absence of sclerotia. This species of Colletotrichum produces rounded or elongated acervula. From these acervuli arise abundant septate brown-black bristles, having a lanceolate terminal cell or having the same diameter as the central cells, numerous small black dots corresponding to the fruiting bodies, isolated or in groups (the acervuli). Under the microscope, the acervuli are made up of conidiophores producing conidia and numerous long, black brown to black bristles protruding from the conidial mass. The conidia are unicellular, hyaline, fusoid with rounded and slightly hooked ends, most often falcate (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Microscopic and macroscopic observation of the conidia of Colletotrichum capsici; A. Pure culture; B. Conidia.

Effect of Balanites aegyptiaca seed extracts and varieties on the incidence of cowpea anthracnose

During the 2020 and 2021 campaigns, a significant difference at (P < 0.001) is recorded between the different treatments for both varieties of cowpea. In 2020, the plot treated with aqueous (T-AqE) and organic extracts of B. aegyptiaca seeds reduced the incidence of anthracnose at 5, 7 and 9 weeks after sowing (WAS). However, at 9 WAS, the disease incidence rate is higher in the control plots (T0: 75.38% and 76.01%) respectively for V1 and V2 and lower in the plots treated with the aqueous (T-AqE: 20.91% and 28.24%) and acetone (T-AcE: 22.75% and 29.28%) extract, respectively for V1 and V2 during the 2020 campaign. Fungicide treatment (T-F: 14.6% and 14.19%) recorded lower disease incidence respectively for V1 and V2 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Effect of Balanites aegyptiaca seed extracts on the incidence of the disease as a function of time during two campaigns.

Varieties Treatments 2020 2021
5 WAS 7 WAS 9 WAS 5 WAS 7 WAS 9 WAS
V1 T0 67.80 ± 0.62a 72.80 ± 0.52a 75.38 ± 0.70b 61.38 ± 0.72a 69.95 ± 0.54a 79.06 ± 0.48a
T-AqE 27.83 ± 0.41g 22.78 ± 0.53h 20.91 ± 0.42h 54.08 ± 1.17c 32.78 ± 0.26f 19.13 ± 0.33g
T-AcE 32.83 ± 0.32e 23.88 ± 0.43g 22.75 ± 0.53e 58.83 ± 0.21b 31.38 ± 0.75f 19.25 ± 0.87g
T-ME 33.55 ± 0.33e 27.78 ± 0.63e 17.83 ± 0.42f 58.80 ± 0.48b 34.78 ± 0.26de 17.93 ± 0.67g
T-Fong 30.52 ± 0.40h 20.78 ± 0.30k 14.60 ± 0.10h 50.50 ± 0.54g 38.61 ± 0.26g 25.54 ± 0.14h
V2 T0 65.90 ± 0.20a 72.83 ± 0.20a 76.01 ± 0.4a 50.90 ± 1.23d 61.15 ± 0.85b 72.43 ± 0.87b
T-AqE 35.65 ± 0.20h 28.19 ± 0.60i 28.24 ± 0.6g 49.64 ± 0.5e 38.33 ± 1.15c 20.81 ± 0.56f
T-AcE 38.45 ± 0.50f 30.12 ± 0.20f 29.28 ± 0.4d 48.45 ± 0.48ef 34.62 ± 0.63e 22.21 ± 1.00f
T-ME 39.88 ± 0.25f 29.30 ± 0.30d 26.69 ± 0.2e 47.55 ± 0.71f 36.30 ± 0.29d 24.15 ± 0.54e
T-Fong 28.29 ± 0.20g 21.31 ± 0.30j 14.19 ± 0.5g 41.92 ± 1.11h 37.43 ± 0.83d 37.60 ± 0.42h
P (V) < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***
P (T) < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***
P (VxT) < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***

As for the 2021 campaign, the plots treated with aqueous (T-AqE: 19.13% and 20.81%); acetone (T-AcE: 19.25% and 22.21%) and methanol (T-ME: 17.93% and 24.15%) extract recorded the lower incidence of anthracnose compared to the control treatment which recorded the higher incidence (T0: 79, 06 and T0: 72.43%) respectively for varieties V1 and V2 (Table 1). Fungicide treatment (T-F: 25.54 and 37.6%) recorded a higher incidence of anthracnose than B. aegyptiaca seed extracts respectively for V1 and V2 at 9 WAS.]

Effect of Balanites aegyptiaca seed extracts and variety on the severity of cowpea anthracnose

A significant difference was recorded between treatments and varieties (P < 0.001) during 2020 and 2021 campaigns (Table 2). Thus in 2020 campaign at 7 WAS, the rate of anthracnose severity was more reduced in plot treated with B. aegyptiaca seeds extract (T-AqE: 22.7%; T-AcE: 25.24% and T-ME: 27.69%) compared to the control plot which recorded the highest severity (T0: 49.83%) for variety V1. For V2 variety at the same period, the rate of anthracnose severity in the control plot was higher (T0: 44.31%), compared to the plot treated with aqueous (T-AqE: 15.61%), acetone (T-AcE: 22.44%) and methanol (T-ME: 22.75%) extracts. But fungicide treatments recorded the higher rate of severity due to anthracnose (T-F: 19.63% and 18.8%) for V1 and V2 respectively. During the 2021 campaign at 9 WAS, plot treated with aqueous (T-AqE: 10.6% and 20.48%), acetone (T-AcE: 12.2% and 12.3%) and methanol (T-ME: 11.63% and 14.39%) extracts recorded the lower rate of disease severity compared to the control plot (T0: 64.14% and 59.82%), respectively for the V1 and V2 variety (Table 2).

Table 2.

Effect of Balanites aegyptiaca seed extracts on disease severity as a function of time during two campaigns.

Varieties Treatments 2020 2021
5 WAS 7 WAS 9 WAS 5 WAS 7 WAS 9 WAS
V1 T0 42.94 ± 0.25a 49.83 ± 0.46a 54.64 ± 0.65a 45.83 ± 0.53a 51.08 ± 0.55a 64.14 ± 0.98a
T-AqE 29.63 ± 0.32ef 22.70 ± 0.06f 14.6 ± 0.12f 38.83 ± 0.54b 18.45 ± 0.91hi 10.60 ± 0.12h
T-AcE 32.95 ± 0.5d 25.24 ± 0.62d 16.2 ± 0.78e 32.83 ± 0.73de 22.99 ± 0.91ef 12.20 ± 0.55gh
T-ME 34.80 ± 0.30c 27.69 ± 0.43e 20.51 ± 0.55d 36.05 ± 0.78c 19.69 ± 0.43gh 11.63 ± 0.72gh
T-Fong 28.77 ± 0.5fg 19.63 ± 0.46g 9.78 ± 0.09h 32.59 ± 0.41de 30.32 ± 0.6d 27.03 ± 0.82e
V2 T0 36.01 ± 0.50c 44.31 ± 0.40b 48.77 ± 0.30b 38.54 ± 0.8b 48.06 ± 0.66b 59.82 ± 0.13b
T-AqE 28.24 ± 0.33g 15.61 ± 0.54h 4.35 ± 0.44j 29.71 ± 0.81f 28.55 ± 0.56d 20.48 ± 0.80f
T-AcE 30.28 ± 0.82e 22.44 ± 0.31f 12.10 ± 0.50g 33.79 ± 0.57e 21.19 ± 1.14fg 12.3 ± 0.56gh
T-ME 28.69 ± 0.43fg 22.75 ± 0.19f 12.76 ± 0.30g 32.50 ± 0.51de 23.25 ± 1.06e 14.39 ± 0.83g
T-Fong 28.96 ± 0.80efg 18.80 ± 0.16g 9.10 ± 0.13h 32.74 ± 0.71de 17.61 ± 0.45ij 9.47 ± 0.37hi
P (V) < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** 0.02727 * < 0.001*** < 0.001***
P (T) < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.00 1*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***
P (VxT) < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***

Effect of different treatments on yield during the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 campaigns

During the two campaigns, a significant difference (P < 0.001) was recorded between the treatments × varieties (Table 3). In the 2020 campaign, plot treated with aqueous extract, acetone and methanol recorded a better yield respectively (T-AqE: 794.05 ± 3.33 kg.ha-1 and 926.63 ± 1.67 kg.ha-1); (T-AcE: 859.15 ± 4.52 kg.ha-1 and 860.23 ± 1.04 kg.ha-1) and (T-ME: 804.55 ± 2.91 kg.ha-1 and 866.15 ± 1.82 kg.ha-1) compared to the control plot (T0: 518.03 ± 3.25 kg.ha-1 and 545.055 ± 1.95 kg.ha-1) which recorded the lower yield, respectively for V1 and V2 (Table 3). During the 2021 campaign, the yield was higher in the aqueous extract treatments (T-AqE: 852.97 ± 1.85 kg.ha-1 and 935.79 ± 2.09 kg.ha-1), at acetone (T-AcE: 823.69 ± 1.78 kg.ha-1 and 961.68 ± 1.56 kg.ha-1) and methanol (T-ME: 658.77 ± 1.11 kg.ha-1 and 885.74 ± 2.04 kg.ha-1) compared to the control plot (T0: 385.37 ± 1.82 kg.ha-1 and 760.47 ± 1.34 kg.ha-1) which recorded the lower average yield respectively for the V1 and V2 varieties. At the end of the observations from the point of view of yield and other parameters evaluated, the most productive variety is the V2 variety (cowpea Lori 24-130).

Table 3.

Yield of two cowpea varieties (kg/ha) depending on treatments during two campaigns.

Treatments 2020 2021
V1 V2 V1 V2
T0 518.03 ± 3.25j 545.055 ± 1.95i 385.37 ± 1.82j 760.47 ± 1.34h
T-AqE 794.05 ± 3.33h 926.63 ± 1.67c 852.97 ± 1.85f 935.79 ± 2.09d
T-AcE 859.15 ± 4.52e 860.23 ± 1.04d 823.69 ± 1.78g 961.68 ± 1.56c
T-ME 804.55 ± 2.91g 866.15 ± 1.82d 658.77 ± 1.11i 885.74 ± 2.04e
T-Fong 894.94 ± 2.05a 901.23 ± 2.99b 850.1 ± 1.48e 1050.68 ± 1.87a
Pr (> F) V < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***
Pr (> F) T < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***
Pr (> F) VxT < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001*** < 0.001***

Multivariate analysis

Principal component analysis

During the campaign 2020, principal component analysis (PCA) made it possible to group the parameters studied and the two cowpea varieties according to their proximity on the axes. The different treatments for each cowpea variety (T0V1, T1V1, T2V1, T3V1, T4V1 and T0V2, T1V2, T2V2, T3V2, T4V2) are screened based on six variables including the total number of leaves, the diameter at crown, plant height, incidence of anthracnose, severity of anthracnose and yield (Yield) for 5, 7 and 9 weeks of observation. The system provides reliable information with a good rate of restitution of information on the total variability on axes 1 and 2 of (86.45%) with two groups trained (Fig. 2A). Group 1 consists of control plot of the two cowpea varieties V1 (Tiligré) and V2 (Lori 24-134). They are very close to the incidence and severity of anthracnose. Group 2 is composed of treatments T4, T3, T2 and T1 respectively the fungicide treatment (T4 = T-Fong), the methanol extract treatment (T3 = T-ME), the extract treatment with acetone (T2 = T-AcE) and treatment with the aqueous extract (T1 = T-AqE) of the two varieties V1 (Tiligré) and V2 (Lori 24-130). They are closer to growth parameters including total number of leaves, plant height and diameter at the collar and characterized by high yield.

Figure 2. 

Principal component analysis between the treatments and the parameters studied in the two cowpea varieties during the 2020 and 2021 campaigns. T0 = Control treatment, T-AqE = Aqueous extract treatment, T-AcE = Acetone extract treatment, T-ME = Methanol extract treatment, T-Fong = Fungicide treatment, V1 = Tiligre, V2 = Lori 24-130.

During the 2021 campaign, the dispersion visualized represents approximately 91.27% (axis 1 and axis 2) of the variation of the system studied (Fig. 2B). The first group is made up of control treatment T0 of the two varieties V1 and V2 which is distant from the growth parameters and yield but closer to the incidence and severity of anthracnose. Group 2 consists of the extract treatment (T1 = T-AqE); of the acetone extract treatment (T2 = T-AcE) and the methanol extract treatment (T3 = T-ME) of the V1 variety which is far from the incidence and severity of the anthracnose and closer to the growth parameters. Group 3 consists of fungicide treatment (T4 = T-Fong.), treatment with aqueous extracts (T1 = T-AqE), treatment with acetone extract (T2 = T-AcE), from the treatment with the methanol extract (T3 = T-ME) of the two varieties V1 and V2 which is far from the incidence and severity of anthracnose and closer to the growth parameters and yield.

Cluster analysis

The dendrogram (dissimilarity of 5%) of the different treatments and the variety according to the different parameters studied shows two groups formed (Fig. 3). Group 1 is made up of the control treatment T0 of the two varieties V1 (Tiligré) and V2 (Lori 24-130) and group 2 is made up of the treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 of the two varieties (V1 and V2). The dendrogram (dissimilarity of 5%) of the different treatments and the variety according to the different parameters studied shows four groups of treatments (Fig. 3B). The first group is made up of the control treatment T0 of the two varieties V1 (Tiligre) and V2 (Lori 24-130); the second is made up of the T4 treatment of the varieties V1 and V2 and the third is made up of the T3 treatment of the two varieties (V1 and V2) and the fourth group is made up of the treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 of the two varieties V1 and V2.

Figure 3. 

Dendrogram of reconciliation between the treatments and the parameters studied in each variety of cowpea during the 2020 and 2021 campaigns. T0 = Control treatment, T-EAq = Aqueous extract treatment, T-AcE = Acetone extract treatment, T-ME = Methanol extract treatment, T-Fong = Fungicide treatment, V1 (Tiligre) and V2 (Lori 24-130).

Discussion

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) is the third most widely grown legume after groundnuts and beans, due to its high protein content. However, its productivity remains limited each year due to several biotic and abiotic constraints that farmers face on a daily basis. To overcome biotic constraints and ensure food security, many countries use synthetic pesticides. Although effective, their intensive and uncontrolled use has many drawbacks for the environment and human health (Gueye et al. 2011; Belkebir 2018).

Morphological characterization was used to identify isolates using infected cowpea pods on PDA medium. Under the microscope, the acervuli are made up of conidiophores producing conidia and numerous long, black brown to black bristles protruding from the conidial mass. The conidia are unicellular, hyaline, fusoid with rounded and slightly hooked ends, most often falcate (Emechebe 1981; Sérémé et al. 2001).

The use of plant extracts as a phytosanitary product could offer a solution as an alternative to synthetic pesticides, especially as these extracts are biodegradable and locally available (Sane et al. 2018; Sherin 2018). Several studies have shown the biopesticidal effect of plant extract rich in naturally occurring compounds (Djeugap et al. 2023; Dida et al. 2024). Like most products with biodegradable pesticide effect, the biological activity of B. aegyptiaca seeds has already been the subject of numerous studies, at the end of which it has been attributed, among other things, fungicidal properties (Toka et al. 2023). The present work examined the fungicidal properties of these aqueous and organic extracts of Balanites aegyptiaca seeds on the development of Colletotrichum capsici (agent responsible for brown rot of cowpea). The results obtained on the evaluation of the epidemiological parameters (incidence and severity) of anthracnose during the 2020 and 2021 campaigns showed a positive action of the treatments on the brown spot disease in cowpea crops, characterized by a gradual decline in the incidence and severity of the disease. These two parameters depend on the stage of development of the plants; the type of treatment, the variety and the growing season. These results are similar to those of (Godlewska et al. 2021; Flore et al. 2023) who showed the importance of plant extracts in protecting crops against fungal diseases for sustainable agriculture; similarly, Bolou Bi-Bolou (2015), showed that extracts of Xylopia aethiopica strongly reduce the incidence of disease caused by Sclerotium rolfsii on treated tomato plants and moreover (Sané et al. 2018; Djeugap et al. 2023). Also showed the effectiveness of aqueous extracts of Artemisia annua, Commelina benghalensis and Euphorbia hirta on growth, yield and incidence of brown spot disease in rice crops. The aqueous and organic extracts of B. aegyptiaca seeds have an effect on the incidence and severity of diseases that is significantly greater than that observed in the control plots. Bioactive compounds in B. aegyptiaca seed extracts have been identified by several researchers as having antifungal, antimicrobial, insecticidal and antibacterial activity (Rubila and Ranghanathan 2014; Habieballa et al. 2021). The specific mechanism of action of biochemical compounds in plant extracts is unclear, but it is likely that these biochemical compounds form complexes with polysaccharides and proteins associated with an outer layer of fungal cells, which can lead to destabilisation of cell membrane function, resulting in pathogen death (Rongai et al. 2017).

The Principal Analyses Component reveal that treatments with B. aegyptiaca extracts (AqE and ME) reduced the incidence and severity of Colletotrichum capsici and increased yields in the same way as the chemical fungicide treatment during both campaigns.

Conclusion

In this study, the aim was to control the development of cowpea anthracnose by using extracts from the seeds of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. in field. The evolution of epidemiological parameters showed a positive effect in plots treated with B. aegyptiaca extracts. This was characterized by a progressive reduction in the incidence and severity of anthracnose on cowpea plants compared with the control during the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 seasons. The best yields were obtained in the treated plots of the two cowpea varieties.

References

  • Abdallah EM, Hsouna ABS (2012) Antimicrobial, antioxidant and phytochemical investigation of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. edible fruit from Sudan. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(52): 11535–11542. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.1102
  • Adam S, Edorh PA, Totin H, Koumoulou L, Amoussou E, Aklikokou K, Boko M (2010) Pesticides and heavy metals in drinking water, soils and sediments of the cotton belt of Gogounou, Kandi and Banikoara (Benin). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 4(4): 1170–1179. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v4i4.63054
  • Al Ashaal HA, Farghaly AA, Abd El Aziz MM, Ali MA (2010) Phytochemical investigation and medicinal evaluation of fixed oil of Balanites aegyptiaca fruits (Balantiaceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 127: 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.10.007
  • Alabi O (1994) Epidemiology of cowpea brown blotch induced by Colletotrichum capsici and assessment of crop losses due to the disease. PhD thesis, Ahmadou, Bello University. Zaria, Nigeria, 95 pp.
  • Aroga R (2007) Main insect pests of corn and their antagonists in forest areas.
  • Belkebir S (2018) Evaluation of the insecticidal effect, on aphids, of the aqueous extract of leaf and flower of Moringa oleifera Lam. Master’s thesis in Agricultural Science, 79 pp.
  • Bolou Bi BA (2015) Inhibition of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. (Corticiaceae), causal agent of tomato stem crown rot, by Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A. Rich. (Annonaceae) and Trichoderma sp. European Scientific Journal, ESJ 11(12): 61–85.
  • Dabiré/Binso C, Ba NM, Sanon A (2008) Training module on insect pests of cowpea in cultivation. 9 pp.
  • Dida SLL, Kuate WNT, Ngatsi P, Mboussi SB, Kone NAN, Gbaporo GCF, Ambang Z (2024) First report of different mating types of Phytophthora infestans isolates from potatoes in Cameroon and their control using Thevetia peruviana (Pers.) K. Schum. seeds extracts analyzed by GC–MS. Indian Phytopathology 77: 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-024-00720-6
  • Djeugap JF, Mbatkam B, Sonkoue MA, Dida SL, Galani HJY, Mbi C, Lapa M, Anchang KY (2023) Field efficacy of aqueous extracts of Artemisia annua, Commelina benghalensis and Euphorbia hirta on rice growth, yield and brown spot disease incidence. Agriculture and Natural Resources 57: 417–426. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2023.57.3.05
  • Dwivedi A, Joshi V, Barpete PK, Akhtar AK, Kaur A, Kumar S (2009) Anthelmintic activity of root bark of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. Ethnobotanical Leaflets 13: 564–567.
  • Elfeel AA, Warrag EI (2011) Conservation status of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. (Hegleig Tree) in Sudan: Local people perspective. Journal of Agricultural Science 3(4): 386–390.
  • Elamin MM, Satti AA (2013) Insecticidal potentialities of Balanites aegyptiaca extracts against the khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium). Global Advanced Research Journal of Environmental Science and Toxicology 2: 005–010.
  • Emechebe AM (1981) Brown blotch of cowpea in northern Nigeria at Samaru. Journal of Agricultural Research 1(1): 20–26.
  • Faye M (2010) New process for splitting Senegalese neem seeds (Azadirachta indica A. JUSSI): production of an oil and cake bio-pesticide. Doctoral thesis from the University of Toulouse, France, 267 pp.
  • Flore M, Martial T, Ebenezer F, Aristide D (2023) Formulation of Biofungicides from Cymbopogon citratus and Tithonia diversifolia: Evaluating its antimicrobial activities against Pythium myriotylum, the causal agent of root rot of Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott. American Journal of Plant Sciences 14: 896–914. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2023.148060
  • Gata-Gonçalvès L, Nogueira JMF, Matos O, De Sousa B (2003) Phytoactive extract from Thevetia peruviana with antifunal properties agains Cladosporuim cucumerinum. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology 70(1): 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(03)00024-1
  • Gayatri N, Sahu RK (2015) Biopesticidal effect of leaf extract of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) on growth parameters and diseases of tomato. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 7(1): 482–488. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i1.636
  • Ghosh S, Tiwari SS, Srivastava S, Sharma AK (2013) Acaricidal properties of Ricinus communis leaf extracts against organophosphate and pyrethroids resistant Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Veterinary Parasitology 192: 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.031
  • Gueye MT, Seck D, Wathelet JP, Lognay G (2011) Control of pests of cereal and legume stocks in Senegal and West Africa: synthesis. Biotechnology and Agronomy Society of Environment 15(1): 183–194.
  • Hamidou F, Harou A, Achirou B, Halilou O, Bakasso Y (2018) Nitrogen fixation in peanuts and cowpeas under drought conditions for improving productivity in the Sahel. Tropicultura 36(1): 63–79.
  • Haruna A, Jada MY, Gali AI, Abaka AK (2020) Antifungal activities and phytochemical analysis of Balanites aegyptiaca seed kernel extract against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing anthracnose disease in mango. Dutse Journal of Agriculture and Food Security (DUJAFS) 7(1): 48–54.
  • Husson O, Charpentier H, Razanamparany C, Moussa N, Michellon R, Naudin K et al. (2010) Corn or sorghum associated with a twining food legume (Cowpea or Vigna umbellata). Practical manual for direct sowing in Madagascar, Volume I: Chapter I. growing cowpea on.
  • Jackson JC (2009) Protein nutritional of cowpea quality and navy bean residue fractions. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 9: 764–778. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajfand.v9i2.19225
  • Kaboré (2004) The nitrogen contributions of legumes and organomineral amendments in cropping systems: impact on cereal yields and long-term soil fertility. Memory IDRI/Agronomy/Polytechnic University of Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, 77 p.
  • Maimouna AH, Ibrahim B, Mahamane MR, Abdoul Aziz S et al. (2020) Diagnostic study of the main constraints of cowpea cultivation (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) in the regions of Maradi and Zinder in Niger. Africa SCIENCE 16(5): 32–43.
  • Modu Y, Putai AJ, Petu-Ibikunle AM (2010) An economic analysis of cowpea production among women farmers in Askira/Uba Local Government Area Borno State Nigeria. African Journal of. Agricultural Research 6: 7–17.
  • Moudingo EJ (2007) Situation of the forests in Cameroon. Cameroon Wild life Society Conservation, 24 pp.
  • Néya JB, Zida EP, Zinga I, Zemba P, TRaoré O (2019) Pathogenic, serological and molecular characterization of the cowpea mosaic virus (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) transmitted by aphids (CABMV) in isolates from Burkina Faso, Cameroon and the Central African Republic. International Journal of Biological Chemistry.
  • Ouédraogo TJ, Tignégré JB, Drabo I, Dabiré C, Ba NM, Néya BJ, Batieno B, Sankara WO, Ilboudo D, Tapsoba B, Ouédraogo L, Bambio K, Herve B (2011) Sheet technique: Variety of tiligré cowpea. 5 pp.
  • Remond D, Walrand S (2017) Legume seeds: nutritional characteristics and effects on health. Agronomic Innovations, INRA, 60.
  • Rongai DP, Pulcini BP, Milan F (2017) Antifungal activity of pomegranate peel extract against Fusarium wilt of tomato. European Journal of Plant Pathology 147: 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-0994-7
  • Rubila S, Ranganathan TV (2014) Evaluation of phytochemical constituents in various heat treatments of Zingiber officinale Roscoe and In vitro antioxidant assay systems. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3: 54–58.
  • Sané B, Badiane D, Gueye MT, Faye O (2018) Evaluation of the biological efficacy of extract of neem (Azadirachta indica Juss.) as an alternative to pyrethroids for the control of the main cotton pests (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in Senegal. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 12(1): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v12i1.12
  • Saraka AI, Abo K, Coulibaly K, Zirihi GN (2018) Phytochemical study and antifungal activity of extracts of some medicinal Euphorbiaceae used among the Baoulé of the Yamoussoukro District (Ivory Coast). European Scientific Journal 14(30): 1857–7881.
  • Sérémé P, Diasso GA, Ake S (2001) Identification in Burkina Faso of a new taxon of Colletotrichum in the etiology of cowpea brown spot disease. Tropicultura 19(3): 156–160.
  • Sherin MMYH (2018) Insecticidal and biological effects of four plant oils on the cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 6(2): 3111–3118.
  • Tchumakov EE (1990) and Zaharova I. Influence and statistics of disease development. In: disease damage to agricultural crops. Edition Agroprome, Moscow, 5–60.
  • Toka NA, Ngatsi ZP, Dida LSL, Tayo TPM, Kuate NWT, Boli H, Atindo TS, Tize T, Ndongo B (2023) Phytochemical analysis and antifungal activity of Azadirachta indica and Balanites aegyptiaca seed extracts against Fusarium oxysporum isolate on tomatoes. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences 11(3): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.22194/JGIAS/23.1159
  • Traoré F, Waongo A, Drabo E, Yamkoulga M, Dabire-Binso C, Sanon A (2019) Effet des périodes d’épandage des huiles de neem (Azadirachta indica L.) sur les populations de Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom et de Maruca vitrata Fabricius dans la culture de niébé. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 13(3): 1300–1307. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v13i3.7
  • USDA (2004) USDA national nutrient database for standard reference, release 17. (Internet) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Nutrient Data laboratory, Beltsville Md, United States.
  • Zakari AH (2003) Effects of seed quality on peanut production in Senegal. Thesis of the Agricultural Engineering Diploma, Specialization in crop production, ENSA, 59 pp.
login to comment