Research Article
Print
Research Article
Evaluation of awareness of mold infections in stored maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Anseba, Debub and Maekel Regions (Zoba) of Eritrea
expand article infoOliver O. Okumu, Rao Sethumadhava, Even Z. Melika, Teklemariam M. Divora, P. G. Samuel, Brhane F. Even, Said J. Yasmin, Tsegay T. Abel
‡ Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Keren, Eritrea
Open Access

Abstract

Survey on farmers’ awareness of mould infection in maize and groundnuts were conducted in various villages in Anseba, Debub and Maekel regions of Eritrea during the summer period between July and December 2023. We administered questionnaires to various farmers in the study areas to assess their knowledge and awareness of mold infections during storage. Maize and groundnut samples were collected for further analysis in the laboratory. It was observed that majority of the farmers had limited knowledge about the timing of infection, contamination, and risks associated with molds. However, more than half (57%) of the respondents were able to identify spoilt grains through rotting (48%), visible insects (21%), and discolouration (10%). The respondents reported several uses for infected grains: approximately 34% consumed them, 26% fed them to livestock and 18.4% sold them to unsuspecting customers. None of the interviewed farmers were aware of the term “mycotoxins” or the associated health hazards while 67% of the respondents did not know measures for controlling mould fungal infection. There was a positive correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.804) between farmers’ knowledge of mold fungi and their ability to understand mycotoxin contamination. Laboratory analysis revealed the presence of Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, Fusarium verticillioides and Penicillium spp. Grains from Koffo storage structure had the highest incidence of mold infection in comparison with other traditional storage structures. These findings indicate a general lack of knowledge about mold fungal infections and the risks among the respondents. Thus, the findings underscore the need for tailored interventions through the ministry of agriculture to promote good agricultural practices aimed at reducing mold and mycotoxin contaminations.

Keywords

Awareness, Groundnuts, Knowledge, Maize, Mould Fungi, Mycotoxins, Traditional Storage

Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are commonly cultivated by small scale farmers in Eritrea. Maize is an important crop mainly produced in the highlands areas of Maekel while groundnut which serves as a protein and fat supplement for this subsistent farmers is mainly produced in Anseba Region. Local meals including bread, fermented maize (bukil), boiling and roasted maize (Colo), as well as commercial products like lactic, citric, and alcohol acids, are all made from maize grains in Eritrea (Shimendi and Nitya 2016). The production areas for maize are characterized by droughts, heavy rains, relatively high average temperatures (>30 °C), high relative humidity, and sporadic floods which have an influence on mold contamination in the field and storage (Shimendi and Nitya 2016). The second major lowland oilseed crop is groundnut, which is high in protein, lipids, minerals, vitamins, and antioxidants as well as health-promoting bioactive substances like arginine, tocopherol, and resveratrol (Varlath and Janilla 2017; Abady et al. 2019). The crop is cultivated in the country’s warm lowlands, which are characterized by severe moisture stress, particularly during flowering. Both the above-ground and underground portions of the plant are impacted by diseases, inadequate production and post-harvest methods, and a lack of improved varieties.

Maize and groundnuts are highly susceptible to toxigenic mold fungal infection specifically from the genera Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium, and subsequent mycotoxin contamination. Aspergillus and Fusarium species invade maize at different production stages at pre- and post-harvest handling (Chulze 2010).

Losses in maize and groundnuts can be as a result of fungal contamination forming molds that results in discoloration and fuzzy appearance of grains. Mold contamination in food grains is widespread in stored grains, is a food safety concern for the many consumers and is associated with the production of toxic metabolites (Suleiman 2015; Kyei et al. 2021). The infection by these mold fungi on maize and groundnuts result in colour change, decrease in nutritional values, and overall quality of the grains through contaminations with mycotoxins (Kyei et al. 2021). Mycotoxigenic fungi are common in the tropical environments, and maize and groundnuts are excellent substrate for the mycotoxin producing fungal species (Mutiga et al. 2014). A significant issue in Sub-Saharan Africa, where agronomic, storage, and climatic conditions encourage the growth of fungi and the production of toxins, are mycotoxins, which are secondary metabolites of molds that are poisonous to both humans and animals (Kumar et al. 2008; Degraeve et al. 2016; Suleiman 2017). The most important groups of mycotoxins are aflatoxin and fumonisin which are carcinogenic, can cause impairment of nutrient absorption, fetal and infant growth retardation, immuno suppression, and liver cancer, (Phokane et al. 2019). Both maize and groundnut can be contaminated with mycotoxins producing fungi in the field and in storage (Mupunga et al. 2014; Beukes et al. 2016; Njoroge et al. 2017). Surveillance of mycotoxin is a problem and difficult to implement in the Africa. For instance, in Kenya, small scale farmers produce nearly 75% of the total maize either used for home consumption or for trading purposes (Mutiga et al. 2014). However, countries can only manage these mycotoxins through policy regulations and regular monitoring for acceptable limits which are not available in the country.

According to Hell and Mutegi (2011) pre and postharvest practices in maize influence mycotoxin accumulation. Pre-harvest contamination is associated with damage by birds, insects, stressful growth conditions and crop susceptibility. While postharvest contamination is a result of inoculum amount, and successful colonization of the hosts at pre-harvest stage. In Eritrea farmers store maize in different structures such as Koffo, mashumae and guffet which expose maize to damages by insects and fungal pathogens. As a result, farmers lose money when fungal and insect pests contaminate grain crops before and after harvest. In spite, of the reported presence of these mycotoxigenic fungi, there is lack of knowledge and awareness on mould fungal infection and mycotoxins among farmers which constitute a serious threat to consumers. For instance, in Uganda, losses up to US$ 577 million occur every year (Lukwago et al. 2019). Very little research has been done on this topic and to our knowledge, this will be the first report on the occurrence of the mold fungi on cereal grains. Creating awareness among the farmers on maize production practices and their influence on contamination is crucial in mitigating the risks of mycotoxin contamination within the communities surveyed. Also identification of these microorganisms will help in strategizing mitigation measure related to mycotoxin problems. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate awareness of the presence of mould fungi on maize and groundnut grains among small scale farmers.

Materials and methods

Survey areas

A descriptive cross-sectional research on the awareness of mold infections in groundnuts and maize that has been stored in Anseba, Maekel and Debub Zobas was carried out between July and September, 2023 (Table 1). In Anseba, surveys were carried out in Hamelmalo, Hagaz villages and Hamelmalo Agricultural College. In Maekel, the surveys took place in Embaderho, Adibidet, Hazega, Adi yakob, and Singubluq. In Debub the villages surveyed were Adikeh, Sketi, Debarwa, Mendefera. Anseba, a semi –arid region of Eritrea, predominantly produces groundnuts, while Maekel and Debub, located in the highlands of Eritrea, primarily produce maize. We obtained lists of farmers who grew and stored maize and groundnuts from Ministry of Agriculture records in the three Zobas. We then randomly selected the farmers for inclusion into the survey.

Table 1.

Description of the surveyed locations/ zobas in Eritrea.

Location Latitude (N), Longitude (E) Elevation (m) Average minimum temperature Average maximum temperature
Anseba 16°28'8.56"N, 37°48'31.68"E 911.72 24.64° 35.38°
Debub 14°56'52.44"N, 39°09'15.84"E 1898.76 17.72° 26.64°
Maekel 15°21'8.36"N, 38°51'44.28"E 2297.88 17.72° 26.64°

Farmers’ awareness on mold contamination in maize and groundnuts

Field survey was conducted via interview and observations during the summer break from July to September. Three geographically different Agro-ecological Zones (AEZs), Zoba Maekel, Debub and Anseba were purposefully selected for this study. In Zoba Maekel and Debub, maize farmers were considered for the survey while in Zoba Anseba only those farmers producing groundnuts were selected to be part of the sample. Then, using a systematic random sampling procedure, the sampling units were chosen at random. The heads of the homes who agreed to take part in the study were subsequently enlisted. As a result, 80 farmers were recruited for the study, of which 50 respondents were from Zoba Maekel and Zoba Debub and 30 farmers were from groundnut producing areas of Zoba Anseba.

Data collection

Questionnaires / interviews schedules were used to collect the data from the respondents in Tigranya, predominant local language, however, the recording was done in English. Data on respondents’ sociodemographics (age, gender, and married status), awareness and knowledge of mold infection and mycotoxin contamination in stored maize and groundnuts, and the dangers of consumption were gathered using a semi-structured questionnaire. At the College of Agriculture, Hamelmalo, the questionnaires were first pre-tested to determine their dependability. To assess knowledge and awareness of mold fungus infection in stored groundnuts and maize, a series of questions was developed. A three-point Likert scale was used to rate the statements: 0 meant “I don’t know,” 1 meant “I’m not sure,” and 2 meant “I know.” We created these by studying existing literature and consulting college researchers regarding the prevalence of mold infections and mycotoxin in Eritrea. Knowledge and awareness were taken from a factor analysis that was done on each set of statements defining each one in particular.

Knowledge assessment

Knowledge assessment was done following a modified method described by Kyei et al. (2021). During the survey we collected specific knowledge information such as awareness of mold contamination on cereals, mold fungal contamination during storage, conditions and practices that promote occurrence of these mold fungi, effect of contamination on quality and quantity of grains, awareness of mycotoxins, their harmful effects on human beings, use of contaminated grains and measures the farmers adopt to manage these mold contaminations. Three categories—i) the timing of mold fungal contamination, (ii) mycotoxin contamination and its detrimental effects, and (iii) preventative measures—were used to summarize and present this data. A score of one was awarded for answering any question correctly in the knowledge assessment; a score of zero was awarded for answering no or incorrectly. The total of all accurate answers in each knowledge category was used to calculate the overall knowledge score. The highest possible score for perfect knowledge.

Maize and groundnut sample collection

Maize and groundnut samples were collected from the selected farmers who participated in the survey. The groundnut samples were collected from three villages in Zoba Anseba, while maize grain samples were collected from five villages in Zoba Maekel and four villages in Zoba Debub. The locations in each village were chosen based on the groundnut and maize potential. Ten samples each weighing 1 kg were collected from each village making a total of 30 samples for Anseba while for maize grains, five 1 kg samples were collected from each village in Maekel making a total of 25 samples. In Zoba Debub, six samples were collected from each village making a total of 24 samples. The sample was selected to be representative of the entire lot. Samples were taken from household maize that was meant for human consumption. The grains were kept in dry polythene bags and stored in cool boxes after which they were transported to Pathology laboratory of Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Eritrea and stored at 4 °C until isolation was done. Additionally, information was obtained about the crop’s variety, soil type, previous crop, dates of planting and harvest, and cultural practices. Common practices for drying materials, grain moistures, and storage structures were noted. Grain samples were collected from each farmers stores/ household across the study villages for fungal isolation in the laboratory.

Isolation and identification mold fungal species associated with groundnut and maize

To detect the presence of fungi in maize and groundnut samples fungal bioassay was done. Both maize and groundnut samples were surface sterilized for one minute in 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite, after which the grains were rinsed in three changes of sterile distilled water and blot dried with sterile paper napkins. Five seeds per plate were used to inoculate the sterilized grains onto Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium. Each sample was replicated three times, and the inoculation plates were incubated at 36 °C. To obtain pure cultures, the fungal growth was subcultured after three to five days. Based on the macro and micro morphological characteristics outlined by Cotty (1994) and Egel et al. (1994), isolates were identified down to the species level. We classified fungal colonies with rapid growth and had white, yellow, yellow-brown, brown to black or shades of green colouration and contained dense erect conidiophores as Aspergillus spp. And those that produced blue coloured spores as Penicillium spp. (Okuda et al. 2000). Isolates with dark green colonies and rough conidia were considered A. parasiticus (Klich 2002). Fungal colonies that produced pinkish colour and with conidia appearing in chains were considered to be Fusarium verticillioides.

Data analysis

After being gathered, the data was cleaned up and entered into Microsoft Excel. After that, the data was imported into version 24.0 of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for analysis. For the analysis, descriptive and comparative statistics were employed. The Genstat computer program, version 15, was used to perform an analysis of variance (ANOVA) on data regarding the frequencies of grain infection by Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium species for samples taken from various locations. For mean comparison, the LSD test was employed at the 0.05 probability level.

Results

Demographic characteristics of farmers

Of the 80 respondents in the study, 91% were males while 8.8% were females of which majority were aged between 41–50 (35%) with mean age being 2.67 (Table 2). Respondents had different levels of education with majority (39%) having achieved only primary education level, a few had secondary education, however, a staggering 20% had no basic education while 7.5% had tertiary level of education. Majority (51%) of the respondents were married, others were divorced while a few were still single. Farming was the main economic activity for all the respondents in various pieces of land. Majority owned land sizes ranging from 3–6 acres from where they practiced farming.

Table 2.

Demographic information of the respondents.

Demographic information Category Frequency (n = 80) Percentage (%)
Gender Male 73.0 91.3
Female 7.0 8.8
Age in years 20–30 14.0 17.5
31–40 18.0 22.5
41–50 28.0 35.0
Above 50 20.0 25.0
Education level None 16.0 20.0
Primary 31.0 38.8
Secondary 27.0 33.8
Tertiary 6.0 7.5
Marital Status Single 20.0 25.0
Married 41.0 51.3
Divorced 12.0 15.0
Bereaved 1.0 1.3
Separated 6.0 7.5
Farm Size (Acres) Less than 3 28.0 35.0
3–6 29.0 36.3
6–9 23.0 28.8

Knowledge assessment and farmers’ awareness of mould infection in maize and groundnuts

An overall score was computed as the sum of all responses in all categories. The maximum attainable score for perfect knowledge was 48 (Table 3). Nine (9) points (18.8% of the total score) for mold contamination and favourable conditions, 7 points (14.5% of the total score) for knowledge on harmful effects of mold and mycotoxin contamination and 8 points (16.7% of the total points) for knowledge on mold and mycotoxin preventative measures. These percentages indicate the relative importance given to knowledge in the three categoriesThe knowledge scores were categorized for descriptive analysis as follows: low knowledge was defined as having less than 30% of the maximum possible score in each category, fair knowledge was defined as having between 30 and 59% of the maximum achievable score, and good knowledge was defined as having more than 60% of the maximum possible score. In all the categories, the study population had had low knowledge on mold contamination and their harmful effect. However, on preventative measures taken, their knowledge was fair. In line with the respondents’ knowledge on preventative measures, many of them indicated drying as the most common preventative measure applied immediately after harvesting. Others mentioned sorting of grains while a few mentioned application of fungicides.

To understand farmers’ knowledge and awareness on mold infection and the risks associated with consumption, we asked them several questions (Table 4). Majority of the farmers (57.5%) were able to identify spoilt grains. The presence of rotting (48%) was predominantly mentioned as a way of knowing spoilt grains. This was followed by visible insects (21%), and discolouration (10%). Among the respondents who were aware of mold contamination on grains, a few noted that occurrence of green substances on grains indicated mold contamination. Majority of the farmers did not sort out their maize cobs after harvesting, however, they cleaned their stores before introducing new grains. Respondents used infected grains in various ways, including feeding livestock (26%), thrown away (12.4%), consuming (34%) and sell in the local market (18.4%). All the interviewed farmers were not aware of the term mycotoxins and the health hazards caused by consumption of mycotoxins contaminated grains. Results further showed that majority of the respondents (67%) did not know measures for controlling mould fungal infection.

Table 3.

Knowledge category.

Category Knowledge Maximum Possible Score Score Low Fair Good
Contamination and conditions 16.0 7.0 0–5 6–10 ≥10
Harmful effects 22.0 8.0 0–7 8–15 ≥15
Preventative measures 10.0 7.0 0–3 4–60 ≥7
Total maximum score 48.0 23.0 0–16 17–32 ≥32
Table 4.

Awareness and knowledge of mould infection in maize and groundnuts among the farmers.

Statements Response n Percentage (%)
Can you identify spoilt maize/ groundnuts? Yes 46.0 57.5
No 0.0 42.5
How do you identify spoilage in grains? Insect damage 15.0 18.8
Rotting 11.0 13.8
Discolouration 41.0 51.1
High moisture grains 13.0 16.3
Do you sort your grains after harvest? Yes 10.0 12.5
No 70.0 87.5
What do you do with spoilt grains? Throw away 8.0 10.0
Sell to the market 21.0 26.0
Consume 11.0 14.0
Livestock feed 40.0 50.0
Causes spoilage in maize and groundnuts? Poor Drying 14.0 17.5
Poor harvesting methods 28.0 35.0
Poor storage structures 38.0 47.5
Do you know how to identify well-dried pods/ grain? Yes 80.0 100.0
No 0.0 0.0
Do you clean the store before storage? Yes 54.0 67.5
No 26.0 32.5
Do you know risks associated with consuming mould infected grains? Yes 4.0 5.0
No 76.0 95.0
Have you heard of the word mycotoxins before? Yes 8.0 10.0
No 72.0 90.0
What measures do you apply to manage these molds Cultural practices 24.0 30.0
Chemical control 19.0 23.8
Physical control 37.0 46.3

Correlation between demographic characteristics and knowledge of farmers on fungal contamination in maize and groundnuts

Table 5 presents important information on association between demographic characteristics and mycotoxins awareness among the respondents. Farmers knowledge of mold fungi positively correlated (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.804) with their ability to understand mycotoxins contamination. Moreover, findings also revealed a positive association (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.247) between farmers’ knowledge on mold infection and cleaning of stores. Furthermore, results also revealed that the level of education had a negative correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = -0.110) with knowledge on mold infection. There was positive correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.309) between the knowledge on mould infections and age of the respondents.

Table 5.

Correlation coefficients between demographic characteristics of the respondents and their knowledge on mycotoxins.

Variables Sex Years Education level Marital status Farm Size cleaning stores Storage structure Knowledge on molds Mycotoxin contamination
Sex 1
Years -.074 1
Education Level -.153 -.063 1
Marital Status .209 .287** -.061 1
Farm Size .135 .188 -.209 .011 1
Cleaning Stores -.026 .295** -.291** .053 .088 1
Storage Structure -.046 -.068 -.083 -.177 .329** -.008 1
Knowledge on molds -.030 .309** -.110 .277* .171 .247* -.229* 1
Mycotoxin Contamination -.044 .218 -.129 .206 .079 .231* -.099 .804** 1

Quality attributes of maize grains collected from farmers

Collected maize grains were checked whether they were in good quality or not (Figure 1). Comparatively, there was no significant differences between grains collected from Zoba Debub and Zoba Maekel in terms of quality. Majority of the grains collected were of good quality, however, insect damage was observed as the most common attribute associated with bad quality maize. Other attributes observed were moldy rotten maize and shriveled maize grains. The occurrence of rotten, shriveled and insect damaged grains creates paths for inoculum spread within the stores and this will finally affect the entire stored grains in time.

Figure 1. 

Quality attributes of maize collected from farmers.

Occurrence of mycotoxigenic fungi in different maize and groundnut storage types

The incidence of mycotoxigenic fungal occurrence were assessed in all maize and groundnut samples collected from farmers from the different storage facilities namely plastic sacks (Mashumae), Koffo (Traditional storage) and Plastic containers (Table 6). Aspergillus species such as Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, and Penicillium spp. were commonly isolated from both maize and groundnuts samples. Fusarium verticillioides was most isolated only from the maize samples. There were significant differences in fungal contamination depending on the type of storage used. Cereal grains stored in Koffo had the highest occurrence of the mycotoxigenic fungi when compared with the other storage types. For instance, A. niger incidence was high in both samples, up to 75.8% incidence was recorded in maize samples and 58.9% in groundnuts. High incidence of A. flavus was recorded in groundnuts samples (43.7%) in comparison to maize samples (15.8%). High incidence (45.6%) of Fusarium verticillioides was recorded in Koffo when compared to other storage types and this was followed by plastic sacks.

Table 6.

Incidence of Mycotoxigenic fungi occurrence in relation to storage types.

Storage Type Maize Groundnuts
A. niger A. flavus Pen spp. F. vert A. niger A. flavus Pen spp
Koffo 75.8a 27.2a 10.6a 45.6a 58.9a 59.8a 6.3a
P. Container 45.8b 8.9b 25.0a 20.3a 3.2b 33.1b 27.7a
P. Sacks 62.8ab 11.4b 18.3a 24.4a 46.5a 38.1ab 22.2a
Mean 61.4 15.8 17.9 30.1 46.5 43.7 18.8
LSD (P ≤ 0.05) 30.2 14.7 27.4 31.7 30.6 20.3 34.3
CV (%) 42.5 78.4 33.3 32.5 52.8 37.2 16.2
Figure 2. 

A. Maize grains infected with A. niger in PDA; B. A. flavus; C. Penicillium growth on PDA; D. Microscopic structures of A. niger; E. A. flavus and F. Penicillium.

Figure 3. 

Traditional storage structures: A. Koffo and B. Mashumae used by farmers to store cereal grains.

Discussion

In many third world income countries with high prevalence of mycotoxin, knowledge and awareness among the rural farmers is still low. Thus, the present study was intended to assess farmers’ knowledge and awareness of mould infection in maize and groundnuts. As far as we are aware, this is the first study on mold associated with mycotoxins in the country. The results indicate total lack of knowledge among the respondents, an outcome that closely mirrors those reported by Magembe et al. (2016) where majority of the farmers did not have knowledge on mould infection and did not understand risks associated with consuming the contaminated grains in Tanzania. The findings are also comparable to those reported by Kimanya et al. (2014), Mboya et al. (2012), TFDA (2012), Shirima et al. (2014), Kamala et al. (2016) where there was lack of awareness on mould growth and mycotoxins production. However, the results contradict those reported by Kyei et al., (2021) where majority of the respondents were aware of molds and mycotoxins in Bangladesh. According to the authors poor harvesting practices and postharvest handling of grains were the major factors associated with mould infection, an observation that was mentioned by the majority of the farmers in this study. The lack of experience in mold fungal contamination during field and post-harvest stages of crop production among the surveyed respondents indicates a limited exposure or lack of knowledge of post-harvest pathogens affecting cereals especially Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium species. Suleiman et al. (2017) found that a significant percentage of respondents knew very little or nothing about mycotoxin contamination. Gong et al. (2002) suggest that raising awareness and knowledge about mycotoxins could help lower the amount of mycotoxin contamination in cereal grains. Furthermore, a lack of public knowledge about mycotoxin contamination exacerbates the issue of mycotoxin contamination in agricultural commodities in Sub-Saharan Africa.

In the present study the respondents’ grain handling activities was relatively poor. For instance, when the farmers were asked whether they sort out the grains, cleaned the store, majority indicated they never did and as such this acted the source of inoculum to the newly introduced grains. The results are similar to those reported by Magembe et al. (2016) in Tanzania where farmers did not sort out their harvests to remove bad quality grains. According to Suleiman et al. (2017) poor postharvest practices can lead to rapid deterioration of grain quality, dry matter losses and mold growth. The respondents also indicated they know bad quality grains through discolouration, insects damage, moldiness, however, they still consumed, sold to other farmers and even fed them to livestock. The same results were reported in Malawi where the respondents knew about risks associated with mycotoxins, however, they still consumed the contaminated grains due to shortage of food (Matumba et al. 2015). The same outcome was reported in Zambia where high insect and fungal infestation was reported in Maize grain samples collected from Chongwe, Solwezi and Mwinilunga (Kankolongo et al. 2008).

Farmers knowledge of mold fungi positively correlated (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.804) with their ability to understand mycotoxins contamination. Moreover, findings also revealed a positive association (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.247) between farmers’ knowledge on mold infection and cleaning of stores. Furthermore, results also revealed that the level of education had a negative correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = -0.291) with how often the respondents cleaned their stores. There was positive correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.309) between the knowledge on mould infections and age of the respondents. Dosman et al. (2001) indicated that individuals with higher education levels are more likely knowledgeable and aware of mycotoxins, however, in our study there was a negative correlation between mold infection and education level. This is likely because majority of the respondent were either primary school drop outs or had no basic education levels. Majority of the farmers lack resources and may not access literature related to fungal or mycotoxin contamination. High farmer to extension officers’ ratio and poor access to publications due to lack of internet facilities is also a contributing factor. It is vital to minimize mycotoxin contamination and knowledge of good agricultural practices be transferred to farmers as well as extension officers (Phokane et al. 2019) According to Adekoya et al. (2017) individuals with low education levels rely on transmittable skills since mycotoxin topic is not covered in primary and secondary school levels. Studies have posited the importance of educational attainment in public awareness of food safety (Oni and Inedia. 2005).

Aspergillus species such as Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, and Penicillium spp. were isolated from both maize and groundnuts samples. Fusarium verticillioides was isolated exclusively from the maize grain samples. Aspergillus spp. exhibited rapid growth with colonies producing white, yellow, yellow-brown, brown to black or shades of green colouration and under the microscope, they had dense erect conidiophores. Penicillium spp. produced blue coloured spores while Fusarium verticillioides produced pinkish colonies on PDA and produced chains of conidia under the microscope. The fungi identified in this study are similar to those reported by Bandh et al. (2010); Keta et al. (2019); Aminu and Keta (2021). In a study conducted in Zambia, Kankolongo et al. (2008) recovered various fungi from samples with the most prevalent one being Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, Aspergillus spp., Fusarium verticillioides, F. solani, Fusarium spp., and Penicillium spp. The results also are similar to those reported by Nyirahakizimana et al. (2013) in Kenya where various Aspergillus species were isolated from groundnuts collected from formal and informal markets. The authors attributed the high incidence to handling practices such as sorting, and storage conditions. The same outcome was reported in Ethiopia where different Aspergillus species such as Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus parasiticus and Penicillium species were found infecting groundnuts (Mohammed and Chala 2014). The problem of these mycotoxigenic fungi go as wide as European countries, for instance, several studies have also confirmed the presence of Aflatoxin producing fungi in Europe (Pleadin et al. 2014; Camardo et al. 2015; Baranyi et al. 2015). These fungi inhabit variety of environments and require different conditions for optimal growth and reproduction. The environmental conditions significantly influence toxin producing fungi and may invade food at the pre-harvesting, harvest-time, post-harvest handling, and storage (Birgen et al. 2020). Aspergillus and Penicillium spp. are ubiquitous in nature, and are therefore common source of contamination to grains. Our study found high frequency isolation of Aspergillus spp, an outcome supported by findings of Ofgea and Gure (2015) and Kankolongo et al. (2008) where Aspergillus was the most abundant and dominant genus. In Kenya, the frequently isolated storage fungi in maize grains are the Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium and Alternaria (Birgen et al. 2020). The high prevalence of this Aspergillus species may be attributed to the moisture content of maize and other environmental factors that favour the spread and colonization of this fungal genera. This study confirms the high occurrence of these mould fungi in grains stored by farmers. The continuous exposure to mycotoxins from contaminated grains has been reported in Kenya (Lewis 2005), South Africa (Sydenham et al. 1990), West Africa (Turner et al. 2005) and other developing countries (Bhat and Vasanthi 2020) with implications to health of consumers and the economy of the country.

The storage method significantly influenced the population of fungal pathogens attacking maize and groundnuts grains. Cereal grains stored in Koffo had the highest occurrence of mycotoxigenic fungi when compared with the other storage types. The results herein are similar to those reported by Lamboni et al. (2009) in Togo where Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium oxysporum were observed on traditional storage facilities infecting maize. Similarly, reports by Julian et al. (1995) in Honduras reported occurrence of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium moniliforme as the predominant storage fungal pathogens affecting maize. This high incidence in the current study could be because farmers mixed old grains with new ones, and often leave koffos open for an extended period of time. Some of these structures provide openings through which pests gain entry to the store thereby damaging the maize. Insect damage associated with Sitophilus zeamais, Prostephanus truncatus, Tribolium castaneum, and Sitotroga cerealella are was observed as the most common attribute associated with bad quality maize. Others observed were moldy rotten maize and shriveled maize grains. Insect pests are the principal cause of post-harvest losses that predispose cereal grains to mycotoxigenic fungi (Hell et al. 2000; Danso et al. 2018). The insects break the grains, and their metabolic activities results in increased relative humidity thus rendering them vulnerable to invasion by fungi (Hell et al. 2000). The type of damage and storage pests observed in this study are similar to those reported by Adugna and Ahmad (2006) who documented the use of plastic bags, barrel, sacks, and Koffo which are predominantly used as the storage types by farmers in Eritrea. In a survey done by Adugna and Ahmad (2006) it was reported that most of the stores were found to contain storage pests causing serious damage to grains. According to Birgen et al. (2020) grains are African traditional storage structures exposes the grains to infection by fungi leading to contamination by mycotoxins. These storage facilities are predisposed to elements like water leaks that results in increased moisture contents creating condition for growth of fungi.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate a huge knowledge gap regarding mould fungal infection among farmers in the study areas. Majority of the farmers could not identify infected grains and a few of the farmers fed these grains to livestock, consumed them and even sold them at the local markets. The use and consumption of these contaminated grains constitute health risk among the consumers in the study areas. The lack of awareness identified in the study should form the basis for developing a tailored intervention strategy to prevent mold and mycotoxin contamination. Knowledge transfer should be initiated through awareness campaigns to inform farmers of the threats and effects of mycotoxins on humans and animals and their implications to trade. Additional, surveillance should be done to monitor mycotoxin contamination. To attain this, there should be access to information and increase in the number of extension officers who will train farmers on these fungal contaminants, mycotoxins and management practices.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the farmers from the three regions for the information provided. We are also grateful to the students who participated in gathering of the information. We also thank Prof, Adugna Haile, Head of Department of Plant Health at Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Eritrea for the support accorded during the period of the study.

References

  • Adekoya I, Njobeh P, Obadina A, Chilaka S, Okoth S, De Boevre M, De Saeger S (2017) Awareness and prevalence of mycotoxins contamination in selected Nigerian fermented foods. Toxins 9(11): 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9110363
  • Adugna H (2006) On-farm storage studies on sorghum and chickpea in Eritrea. African Journal of Biotechnology 5(17): 1537–1544.
  • Adugna H, Tufail A (2006) Survey on storage method, insect pest and loss assessment of stored grains in Anseba region, Eritrea. International Journal of Plant Protection 12: 110–118. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJPP/12.2/110-118
  • Baranyi N, Despot DJ, Palagyi A, Kiss N, Kocsube S, Szekeres A, Kecskemeti A, Bencsik O, Vagvolgyi C, Klaric MS, Varga J (2015) Identification of Aspergillus species in Central Europe able to produce G-type aflatoxins. Acta Biologica Hungarica 66: 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1556/018.66.2015.3.9
  • Beukes I, Rose LJ, Shephard GS, Flett BC, Viljoen A (2017) Mycotoxigenic Fusarium species associated with grain crops in South Africa – A review. South African Journal of Science 113(3/4). [12 pp.] https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160121
  • Birgen JK, Cheruiyot RC, Akwa TE (2020) Mycotoxin contamination of stored maize in Kenya and the associated fungi. Journal of Plant Pathology Research 2(1): 7–13. https://doi.org/10.36959/394/620
  • CamardoLeggieri M, Bertuzzi T, Pietri A, Battilani P (2015) Mycotoxin occurrence in maize produced in Northern Italy over the years 2009–2011: Focus on the role of crop related factors. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 54: 212–221.
  • Degraeve S, Madege RR, Audenaert K, Kamala A, Ortiz J, Kimaya M, Tiisekwa B, De Meulenaer B, Haesaert G (2016) Impact of local pre-harvest management practices in maize on the occurrence of Fusarium species and associated mycotoxins in two agro-ecosystems in Tanzania. Food Control 59: 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.028
  • Egel DS, Cotty PJ, Elias S (1994) Relationship among isolates of Aspergillus sect. flavi that vary in aflatoxin production. Phytopathology 84: 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-906
  • Hell K, Mutegi C, Fandohan P (2010) Aflatoxin control and prevention strategies in maize for Sub-Saharan Africa. Julius-Kühn-Archiv (425): 534.
  • Kamala A, Kimanya M, Haesaert G, Tiisekwa B, Madege R, Degraeve S, Cyprian C, De Meulenaer B (2016) Local post-harvest practices associated with aflatoxins and fumonisins contamination of maize in three agro ecological zones of Tanzania. Food Additives and Contaminants, Part A 33(3): 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2016.1138546
  • Kimanya ME, Shirima CP, Magoha H, Shewiyo DH, De Meulenaer B, Kolsteren P, Gong YY (2014) Co exposures of aflatoxins with deoxynivalenol and fumonisins from maize based complementary foods in Rombo, Northern Tanzania. Food Control 41: 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.034
  • Kyei NA, Waid LJ, Ali N, Gabrysch S (2021) Awareness, experience and knowledge of farming households in rural Bangladesh regrading mold contamination of food crops: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research in Public Health 18(19): 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910335
  • Lamboni Y, Hell K (2009) Propagation of mycotoxigenic fungi in maize stores by post-harvest insects. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 29: 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758409391511
  • Matumba L, Monjerezi M, Kankwamba H, Njoroge SMC, Ndilowe P, Kabuli H, Kambewa D, Njapau H (2015) Knowledge, attitude and practices concerning presences of molds in foods among members of the general public in Malawi. Mycotoxins Research 32: 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-015-0237-3
  • Mboya R, Bogale A (2012) Mycotoxin contamination of food and its possible implications on sustainable development in Rungwe District, Tanzania. OIDA. International Journal of Sustainable Development 5(7): 37–46.
  • Mohammed A, Chala A (2014) Incidence of Aspergillus contamination of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Eastern Ethiopia. African Journal of Microbiology Research 8(8): 759–765. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.2078
  • Mupunga I, Lebelo SL, Mngqawa P, Rheeder JP, Katerere DR (2014) Natural occurrence of aflatoxins in peanuts and peanut butter from Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Journal of Food Protection 77: 1814–1818. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-129
  • Mutiga SK, Were V, Hoffmann V, Harvey JW, Milgroom MG, Nelson RJ (2014) Extent and drivers of mycotoxin contamination: Inferences from a survey of Kenyan maize mills. Phytopathology 104: 1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-14-0006-R
  • Njoroge SMC, Matumba L, Kanenga Siambi M, Waliyar F, Maruwo J, Machinjiri N, Monyo ES (2017) Aflatoxin B1 levels in groundnut products from local markets in Zambia. Mycotoxin Research 33(2): 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-017-0270-5
  • Nyirahakizimana H, Mwamburi L, Wakhisi J, Mutegi CK, Christie ME, Wagacha JM (2013) Occurrence of Aspergillus species and aflatoxin contamination in raw and roasted peanuts from formal and informal markets in Eldoret and Kericho towns, Kenya. Advances in Microbiology 3: 333–342. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2013.34047
  • Oni OA, Inedia OF (2005) Consumer willingness to pay for safety labels in Nigeria. A case study. Journal of Central European Agriculture 6: 381–388.
  • Phokane S, Flett BC, Ncube E, Rheeder JP, Rose LJ (2019) Agricultural practices and their potential role in mycotoxin contamination of maize and groundnut subsistence farming. South African Journal of Science 115(9/10). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6221
  • Pleadin J, Vulic A, Persi N, Skrivanko M, Capek B, Cvetnic Z (2014) Aflatoxin B1 occurrence in maize sampled from Croatian farms and feed factories during 2013. Food Control 40: 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.022
  • Varlath MT, Janila P (2017) Economic and Academic Importance of Peanut. In: Varshney R, Pandey M, Puppala N (Eds) The Peanut Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63935-2_2
login to comment