Research Article |
Corresponding author: Oliver O. Okumu ( oliverotieno182@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Shi Xue
© 2024 Oliver O. Okumu, Rao Sethumadhava, Even Z. Melika, Teklemariam M. Divora, P. G. Samuel, Brhane F. Even, Said J. Yasmin, Tsegay T. Abel.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Okumu OO, Sethumadhava R, Melika EZ, Divora TM, Samuel PG, Even BF, Yasmin SJ, Abel TT (2024) Evaluation of awareness of mold infections in stored maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) in Anseba, Debub and Maekel Regions (Zoba) of Eritrea. Innovations in Agriculture 7: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3897/ia.2024.132491
|
Survey on farmers’ awareness of mould infection in maize and groundnuts were conducted in various villages in Anseba, Debub and Maekel regions of Eritrea during the summer period between July and December 2023. We administered questionnaires to various farmers in the study areas to assess their knowledge and awareness of mold infections during storage. Maize and groundnut samples were collected for further analysis in the laboratory. It was observed that majority of the farmers had limited knowledge about the timing of infection, contamination, and risks associated with molds. However, more than half (57%) of the respondents were able to identify spoilt grains through rotting (48%), visible insects (21%), and discolouration (10%). The respondents reported several uses for infected grains: approximately 34% consumed them, 26% fed them to livestock and 18.4% sold them to unsuspecting customers. None of the interviewed farmers were aware of the term “mycotoxins” or the associated health hazards while 67% of the respondents did not know measures for controlling mould fungal infection. There was a positive correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.804) between farmers’ knowledge of mold fungi and their ability to understand mycotoxin contamination. Laboratory analysis revealed the presence of Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, Fusarium verticillioides and Penicillium spp. Grains from Koffo storage structure had the highest incidence of mold infection in comparison with other traditional storage structures. These findings indicate a general lack of knowledge about mold fungal infections and the risks among the respondents. Thus, the findings underscore the need for tailored interventions through the ministry of agriculture to promote good agricultural practices aimed at reducing mold and mycotoxin contaminations.
Awareness, Groundnuts, Knowledge, Maize, Mould Fungi, Mycotoxins, Traditional Storage
Maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are commonly cultivated by small scale farmers in Eritrea. Maize is an important crop mainly produced in the highlands areas of Maekel while groundnut which serves as a protein and fat supplement for this subsistent farmers is mainly produced in Anseba Region. Local meals including bread, fermented maize (bukil), boiling and roasted maize (Colo), as well as commercial products like lactic, citric, and alcohol acids, are all made from maize grains in Eritrea (Shimendi and Nitya 2016). The production areas for maize are characterized by droughts, heavy rains, relatively high average temperatures (>30 °C), high relative humidity, and sporadic floods which have an influence on mold contamination in the field and storage (Shimendi and Nitya 2016). The second major lowland oilseed crop is groundnut, which is high in protein, lipids, minerals, vitamins, and antioxidants as well as health-promoting bioactive substances like arginine, tocopherol, and resveratrol (Varlath and Janilla 2017; Abady et al. 2019). The crop is cultivated in the country’s warm lowlands, which are characterized by severe moisture stress, particularly during flowering. Both the above-ground and underground portions of the plant are impacted by diseases, inadequate production and post-harvest methods, and a lack of improved varieties.
Maize and groundnuts are highly susceptible to toxigenic mold fungal infection specifically from the genera Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium, and subsequent mycotoxin contamination. Aspergillus and Fusarium species invade maize at different production stages at pre- and post-harvest handling (
Losses in maize and groundnuts can be as a result of fungal contamination forming molds that results in discoloration and fuzzy appearance of grains. Mold contamination in food grains is widespread in stored grains, is a food safety concern for the many consumers and is associated with the production of toxic metabolites (Suleiman 2015;
According to Hell and Mutegi (2011) pre and postharvest practices in maize influence mycotoxin accumulation. Pre-harvest contamination is associated with damage by birds, insects, stressful growth conditions and crop susceptibility. While postharvest contamination is a result of inoculum amount, and successful colonization of the hosts at pre-harvest stage. In Eritrea farmers store maize in different structures such as Koffo, mashumae and guffet which expose maize to damages by insects and fungal pathogens. As a result, farmers lose money when fungal and insect pests contaminate grain crops before and after harvest. In spite, of the reported presence of these mycotoxigenic fungi, there is lack of knowledge and awareness on mould fungal infection and mycotoxins among farmers which constitute a serious threat to consumers. For instance, in Uganda, losses up to US$ 577 million occur every year (
A descriptive cross-sectional research on the awareness of mold infections in groundnuts and maize that has been stored in Anseba, Maekel and Debub Zobas was carried out between July and September, 2023 (Table
Location | Latitude (N), Longitude (E) | Elevation (m) | Average minimum temperature | Average maximum temperature |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anseba | 16°28'8.56"N, 37°48'31.68"E | 911.72 | 24.64° | 35.38° |
Debub | 14°56'52.44"N, 39°09'15.84"E | 1898.76 | 17.72° | 26.64° |
Maekel | 15°21'8.36"N, 38°51'44.28"E | 2297.88 | 17.72° | 26.64° |
Field survey was conducted via interview and observations during the summer break from July to September. Three geographically different Agro-ecological Zones (AEZs), Zoba Maekel, Debub and Anseba were purposefully selected for this study. In Zoba Maekel and Debub, maize farmers were considered for the survey while in Zoba Anseba only those farmers producing groundnuts were selected to be part of the sample. Then, using a systematic random sampling procedure, the sampling units were chosen at random. The heads of the homes who agreed to take part in the study were subsequently enlisted. As a result, 80 farmers were recruited for the study, of which 50 respondents were from Zoba Maekel and Zoba Debub and 30 farmers were from groundnut producing areas of Zoba Anseba.
Questionnaires / interviews schedules were used to collect the data from the respondents in Tigranya, predominant local language, however, the recording was done in English. Data on respondents’ sociodemographics (age, gender, and married status), awareness and knowledge of mold infection and mycotoxin contamination in stored maize and groundnuts, and the dangers of consumption were gathered using a semi-structured questionnaire. At the College of Agriculture, Hamelmalo, the questionnaires were first pre-tested to determine their dependability. To assess knowledge and awareness of mold fungus infection in stored groundnuts and maize, a series of questions was developed. A three-point Likert scale was used to rate the statements: 0 meant “I don’t know,” 1 meant “I’m not sure,” and 2 meant “I know.” We created these by studying existing literature and consulting college researchers regarding the prevalence of mold infections and mycotoxin in Eritrea. Knowledge and awareness were taken from a factor analysis that was done on each set of statements defining each one in particular.
Knowledge assessment was done following a modified method described by
Maize and groundnut samples were collected from the selected farmers who participated in the survey. The groundnut samples were collected from three villages in Zoba Anseba, while maize grain samples were collected from five villages in Zoba Maekel and four villages in Zoba Debub. The locations in each village were chosen based on the groundnut and maize potential. Ten samples each weighing 1 kg were collected from each village making a total of 30 samples for Anseba while for maize grains, five 1 kg samples were collected from each village in Maekel making a total of 25 samples. In Zoba Debub, six samples were collected from each village making a total of 24 samples. The sample was selected to be representative of the entire lot. Samples were taken from household maize that was meant for human consumption. The grains were kept in dry polythene bags and stored in cool boxes after which they were transported to Pathology laboratory of Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Eritrea and stored at 4 °C until isolation was done. Additionally, information was obtained about the crop’s variety, soil type, previous crop, dates of planting and harvest, and cultural practices. Common practices for drying materials, grain moistures, and storage structures were noted. Grain samples were collected from each farmers stores/ household across the study villages for fungal isolation in the laboratory.
To detect the presence of fungi in maize and groundnut samples fungal bioassay was done. Both maize and groundnut samples were surface sterilized for one minute in 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite, after which the grains were rinsed in three changes of sterile distilled water and blot dried with sterile paper napkins. Five seeds per plate were used to inoculate the sterilized grains onto Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium. Each sample was replicated three times, and the inoculation plates were incubated at 36 °C. To obtain pure cultures, the fungal growth was subcultured after three to five days. Based on the macro and micro morphological characteristics outlined by
After being gathered, the data was cleaned up and entered into Microsoft Excel. After that, the data was imported into version 24.0 of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for analysis. For the analysis, descriptive and comparative statistics were employed. The Genstat computer program, version 15, was used to perform an analysis of variance (ANOVA) on data regarding the frequencies of grain infection by Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium species for samples taken from various locations. For mean comparison, the LSD test was employed at the 0.05 probability level.
Of the 80 respondents in the study, 91% were males while 8.8% were females of which majority were aged between 41–50 (35%) with mean age being 2.67 (Table
Demographic information | Category | Frequency (n = 80) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 73.0 | 91.3 |
Female | 7.0 | 8.8 | |
Age in years | 20–30 | 14.0 | 17.5 |
31–40 | 18.0 | 22.5 | |
41–50 | 28.0 | 35.0 | |
Above 50 | 20.0 | 25.0 | |
Education level | None | 16.0 | 20.0 |
Primary | 31.0 | 38.8 | |
Secondary | 27.0 | 33.8 | |
Tertiary | 6.0 | 7.5 | |
Marital Status | Single | 20.0 | 25.0 |
Married | 41.0 | 51.3 | |
Divorced | 12.0 | 15.0 | |
Bereaved | 1.0 | 1.3 | |
Separated | 6.0 | 7.5 | |
Farm Size (Acres) | Less than 3 | 28.0 | 35.0 |
3–6 | 29.0 | 36.3 | |
6–9 | 23.0 | 28.8 |
An overall score was computed as the sum of all responses in all categories. The maximum attainable score for perfect knowledge was 48 (Table
To understand farmers’ knowledge and awareness on mold infection and the risks associated with consumption, we asked them several questions (Table
Category Knowledge | Maximum Possible Score | Score | Low | Fair | Good |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contamination and conditions | 16.0 | 7.0 | 0–5 | 6–10 | ≥10 |
Harmful effects | 22.0 | 8.0 | 0–7 | 8–15 | ≥15 |
Preventative measures | 10.0 | 7.0 | 0–3 | 4–60 | ≥7 |
Total maximum score | 48.0 | 23.0 | 0–16 | 17–32 | ≥32 |
Awareness and knowledge of mould infection in maize and groundnuts among the farmers.
Statements | Response | n | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Can you identify spoilt maize/ groundnuts? | Yes | 46.0 | 57.5 |
No | 0.0 | 42.5 | |
How do you identify spoilage in grains? | Insect damage | 15.0 | 18.8 |
Rotting | 11.0 | 13.8 | |
Discolouration | 41.0 | 51.1 | |
High moisture grains | 13.0 | 16.3 | |
Do you sort your grains after harvest? | Yes | 10.0 | 12.5 |
No | 70.0 | 87.5 | |
What do you do with spoilt grains? | Throw away | 8.0 | 10.0 |
Sell to the market | 21.0 | 26.0 | |
Consume | 11.0 | 14.0 | |
Livestock feed | 40.0 | 50.0 | |
Causes spoilage in maize and groundnuts? | Poor Drying | 14.0 | 17.5 |
Poor harvesting methods | 28.0 | 35.0 | |
Poor storage structures | 38.0 | 47.5 | |
Do you know how to identify well-dried pods/ grain? | Yes | 80.0 | 100.0 |
No | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Do you clean the store before storage? | Yes | 54.0 | 67.5 |
No | 26.0 | 32.5 | |
Do you know risks associated with consuming mould infected grains? | Yes | 4.0 | 5.0 |
No | 76.0 | 95.0 | |
Have you heard of the word mycotoxins before? | Yes | 8.0 | 10.0 |
No | 72.0 | 90.0 | |
What measures do you apply to manage these molds | Cultural practices | 24.0 | 30.0 |
Chemical control | 19.0 | 23.8 | |
Physical control | 37.0 | 46.3 |
Table
Correlation coefficients between demographic characteristics of the respondents and their knowledge on mycotoxins.
Variables | Sex | Years | Education level | Marital status | Farm Size | cleaning stores | Storage structure | Knowledge on molds | Mycotoxin contamination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | 1 | ||||||||
Years | -.074 | 1 | |||||||
Education Level | -.153 | -.063 | 1 | ||||||
Marital Status | .209 | .287** | -.061 | 1 | |||||
Farm Size | .135 | .188 | -.209 | .011 | 1 | ||||
Cleaning Stores | -.026 | .295** | -.291** | .053 | .088 | 1 | |||
Storage Structure | -.046 | -.068 | -.083 | -.177 | .329** | -.008 | 1 | ||
Knowledge on molds | -.030 | .309** | -.110 | .277* | .171 | .247* | -.229* | 1 | |
Mycotoxin Contamination | -.044 | .218 | -.129 | .206 | .079 | .231* | -.099 | .804** | 1 |
Collected maize grains were checked whether they were in good quality or not (Figure
The incidence of mycotoxigenic fungal occurrence were assessed in all maize and groundnut samples collected from farmers from the different storage facilities namely plastic sacks (Mashumae), Koffo (Traditional storage) and Plastic containers (Table
Incidence of Mycotoxigenic fungi occurrence in relation to storage types.
Storage Type | Maize | Groundnuts | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. niger | A. flavus | Pen spp. | F. vert | A. niger | A. flavus | Pen spp | |
Koffo | 75.8a | 27.2a | 10.6a | 45.6a | 58.9a | 59.8a | 6.3a |
P. Container | 45.8b | 8.9b | 25.0a | 20.3a | 3.2b | 33.1b | 27.7a |
P. Sacks | 62.8ab | 11.4b | 18.3a | 24.4a | 46.5a | 38.1ab | 22.2a |
Mean | 61.4 | 15.8 | 17.9 | 30.1 | 46.5 | 43.7 | 18.8 |
LSD (P ≤ 0.05) | 30.2 | 14.7 | 27.4 | 31.7 | 30.6 | 20.3 | 34.3 |
CV (%) | 42.5 | 78.4 | 33.3 | 32.5 | 52.8 | 37.2 | 16.2 |
In many third world income countries with high prevalence of mycotoxin, knowledge and awareness among the rural farmers is still low. Thus, the present study was intended to assess farmers’ knowledge and awareness of mould infection in maize and groundnuts. As far as we are aware, this is the first study on mold associated with mycotoxins in the country. The results indicate total lack of knowledge among the respondents, an outcome that closely mirrors those reported by Magembe et al. (2016) where majority of the farmers did not have knowledge on mould infection and did not understand risks associated with consuming the contaminated grains in Tanzania. The findings are also comparable to those reported by
In the present study the respondents’ grain handling activities was relatively poor. For instance, when the farmers were asked whether they sort out the grains, cleaned the store, majority indicated they never did and as such this acted the source of inoculum to the newly introduced grains. The results are similar to those reported by Magembe et al. (2016) in Tanzania where farmers did not sort out their harvests to remove bad quality grains. According to Suleiman et al. (2017) poor postharvest practices can lead to rapid deterioration of grain quality, dry matter losses and mold growth. The respondents also indicated they know bad quality grains through discolouration, insects damage, moldiness, however, they still consumed, sold to other farmers and even fed them to livestock. The same results were reported in Malawi where the respondents knew about risks associated with mycotoxins, however, they still consumed the contaminated grains due to shortage of food (
Farmers knowledge of mold fungi positively correlated (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.804) with their ability to understand mycotoxins contamination. Moreover, findings also revealed a positive association (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.247) between farmers’ knowledge on mold infection and cleaning of stores. Furthermore, results also revealed that the level of education had a negative correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = -0.291) with how often the respondents cleaned their stores. There was positive correlation (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.309) between the knowledge on mould infections and age of the respondents.
Aspergillus
species such as Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, and Penicillium spp. were isolated from both maize and groundnuts samples. Fusarium verticillioides was isolated exclusively from the maize grain samples. Aspergillus spp. exhibited rapid growth with colonies producing white, yellow, yellow-brown, brown to black or shades of green colouration and under the microscope, they had dense erect conidiophores. Penicillium spp. produced blue coloured spores while Fusarium verticillioides produced pinkish colonies on PDA and produced chains of conidia under the microscope. The fungi identified in this study are similar to those reported by Bandh et al. (2010); Keta et al. (2019); Aminu and Keta (2021). In a study conducted in Zambia, Kankolongo et al. (2008) recovered various fungi from samples with the most prevalent one being Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, Aspergillus spp., Fusarium verticillioides, F. solani, Fusarium spp., and Penicillium spp. The results also are similar to those reported by
The storage method significantly influenced the population of fungal pathogens attacking maize and groundnuts grains. Cereal grains stored in Koffo had the highest occurrence of mycotoxigenic fungi when compared with the other storage types. The results herein are similar to those reported by Lamboni et al. (2009) in Togo where Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium oxysporum were observed on traditional storage facilities infecting maize. Similarly, reports by Julian et al. (1995) in Honduras reported occurrence of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium moniliforme as the predominant storage fungal pathogens affecting maize. This high incidence in the current study could be because farmers mixed old grains with new ones, and often leave koffos open for an extended period of time. Some of these structures provide openings through which pests gain entry to the store thereby damaging the maize. Insect damage associated with Sitophilus zeamais, Prostephanus truncatus, Tribolium castaneum, and Sitotroga cerealella are was observed as the most common attribute associated with bad quality maize. Others observed were moldy rotten maize and shriveled maize grains. Insect pests are the principal cause of post-harvest losses that predispose cereal grains to mycotoxigenic fungi (Hell et al. 2000; Danso et al. 2018). The insects break the grains, and their metabolic activities results in increased relative humidity thus rendering them vulnerable to invasion by fungi (Hell et al. 2000). The type of damage and storage pests observed in this study are similar to those reported by Adugna and Ahmad (2006) who documented the use of plastic bags, barrel, sacks, and Koffo which are predominantly used as the storage types by farmers in Eritrea. In a survey done by Adugna and Ahmad (2006) it was reported that most of the stores were found to contain storage pests causing serious damage to grains. According to
The findings demonstrate a huge knowledge gap regarding mould fungal infection among farmers in the study areas. Majority of the farmers could not identify infected grains and a few of the farmers fed these grains to livestock, consumed them and even sold them at the local markets. The use and consumption of these contaminated grains constitute health risk among the consumers in the study areas. The lack of awareness identified in the study should form the basis for developing a tailored intervention strategy to prevent mold and mycotoxin contamination. Knowledge transfer should be initiated through awareness campaigns to inform farmers of the threats and effects of mycotoxins on humans and animals and their implications to trade. Additional, surveillance should be done to monitor mycotoxin contamination. To attain this, there should be access to information and increase in the number of extension officers who will train farmers on these fungal contaminants, mycotoxins and management practices.
We are grateful to the farmers from the three regions for the information provided. We are also grateful to the students who participated in gathering of the information. We also thank Prof, Adugna Haile, Head of Department of Plant Health at Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Eritrea for the support accorded during the period of the study.