Research Article
Print
Research Article
Organic versus conventional fertilization: impacts on growth, yield and profitability of lettuce cultivars
expand article infoNazma Akter‡, Md. Nur Nabi§, Sushan Chowhan|, Emrul Kayesh§, Mohammad Saiful Alam, Md. Shyduzzaman Roni§
‡ Uttar Durgapur Govt. Primary School, Motlab uttar, Chandpur, Bangladesh
§ Department of Horticulture, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh
| Adaptive Research and Extension Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Sub-station Magura, Magura, Bangladesh
¶ Department of Soil Science, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh
Open Access

Abstract

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is an increasingly popular leafy vegetable in Bangladesh due to its high nutritional value and growing consumer preference for fresh salads. However, productivity remains low compared to major lettuce-producing countries like China and USA, largely because of inadequate cultivar selection and suboptimal nutrient management. The current study was carried out at Gazipur Agricultural University in Bangladesh during the winter to assess the growth performance, yield potential, and economic viability of three lettuce cultivars viz. Green Wave, Grand Rapids, and Iceberg under organic and conventional fertilization systems. Three cultivars and two fertilization techniques were combined in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Evaluations of yield, profitability, and growth characteristics (plant height, quantity, size, and area of leaves) were observed and analyzed. Results revealed significant interaction effects between cultivar and fertilization method for most growth and yield parameters. The Iceberg cultivar produced the highest marketable yield under conventional fertilization (31.0 t ha-1), while organic fertilization enhanced plant height and leaf area in Green Wave. Economic analysis indicated that Iceberg grown under organic fertilization provided the highest benefit-cost ratio (1.84), owing to premium market prices and lower input costs. Overall, the study demonstrates that cultivar choice strongly influences lettuce performance under different fertilization systems, and that organic cultivation of Iceberg lettuce offers a profitable and sustainable option for Bangladeshi farmers.

Keywords

Conventional fertilization, growth, lettuce BCR, organic fertilization, yield

Introduction

Among salad crops, lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is the most widely used and takes up the greatest space worldwide. It is a member of Asteraceae, the biggest dicotyledonous family (formerly Compositae). It is a tall, milky-juiced annual leafy herb. Early in the season, it grows a short stem and a cluster of leaves that, depending on the variety, vary greatly in shape, character, and color. It is widely acknowledged that Europe and Asia are where it first appeared in the New World (Masarirambi et al. 2012). It was brought to several nations, including America, Europe, China, and others, shortly after the New World was discovered. Eventually, it spread to the rest of the world. China is currently the world’s top producer of lettuce, with the United States coming in second. It is frequently eaten either by itself or with dressing and is typically used as a salad with tomatoes, carrots, cucumbers, or other salad vegetables. Among the main vegetables, lettuce stands out since it is consumed almost exclusively raw (Snowdon 2001). Although it cannot be considered a major salad crop, it has become one of the most significant and popular salad crops in Bangladesh because of its many uses, nutritional value, and delicious flavor. Although lettuce is becoming more and more popular, Bangladeshi farmers are not well-informed on its production package. For growth and development, this vegetable needs a lot of nitrogenous fertilizer. However, using too much nitrogen fertilizer to boost crop output affects the soil’s nutritional balance, pollutes the soil, lowers crop quality, and may render a significant portion of the resources unusable (Ahmed et al. 2022). In order to achieve a greater vegetable output, soil health is essential (Nahar et al. 2021; Jannat et al. 2023). Comparative studies show a consistent but nuanced story about how lettuce responds to organic and conventional fertilization. Under controlled conditions, conventional mineral fertilizers rapidly increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability, resulting in higher chlorophyll content, stronger canopy development, and greater fresh biomass, while organic amendments such as compost acted more slowly and produced lower short-term yields despite improving soil organic matter and amino acid accumulation (García-Rández et al. 2025). However, evidence also shows that when organic fertilization is carefully managed, especially in combination with biostimulants, it can significantly enhance lettuce morphology and yield, increase head mass and leaf number while also promoting beneficial secondary metabolites related to stress tolerance (Fajdetić et al. 2025). Over the long term, field-based comparisons further indicate that organically managed systems can sometimes match or even surpass conventional yields, with organically grown lettuce showing higher fresh weight in certain trials, highlighting the importance of management practices and time scale when evaluating productivity and profitability (Dhakal and Nandwani 2022). Concerns over the long-term sustainability of crop production have grown as evidence shows that excessive use of chemical fertilizers can degrade soil health and threaten sustainable productivity (Virgine Tenshia and Singram 2005). At the same time, consumers increasingly associate organic farming with higher produce quality, driving demand for vegetables grown with fewer or no synthetic inputs. In response to the environmental and health risks linked to chemical fertilizers, many farmers are shifting toward vegetable production systems that avoid inorganic fertilizers altogether (Asaduzzaman et al. 2010; Chowhan 2021a). As a result, organic farming has emerged as a widely accepted alternative for reducing health risks while supporting more sustainable agricultural practices.

The lettuce is perfectly suited to Bangladesh’s Rabi season. In comparison to other nations that cultivate lettuce, such as Italy (73.5 t ha-1), Japan (58.6 t ha-1), and India (108.9 t ha-1), this country’s lettuce farming is restricted to a very small area with minimal production and an average yield of only 4.0 t ha-1 (FAOSTAT 2025). Lack of knowledge about contemporary production techniques, such as appropriate genotypes, ideal planting times, fertilizer requirements, soil fertility status, etc., may be the primary cause of this country’s poor lettuce yield (Chowhan 2016; Chowhan 2021b). In the context of the aforementioned facts, the current study was conducted to examine the vegetative development, yield, and economic suitability of lettuce cultivars under conventional and organic fertilization, as well as to determine the optimal combinations for long-term crop productivity.

Materials and methods

The experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm of Gazipur Agricultural University (GAU), Salna, Gazipur during the winter season. The cultivar of lettuce used in this experiment was the Green Wave, Grand Rapids and Iceberg were collected from the market of Siddique Bazar of Dhaka. The experiment comprised of six treatments (T1 = Green Wave × Organic, T2 = Grand Rapids × Organic, T3 = Iceberg × Organic, T4 = Green Wave × Conventional, T5 = Grand Rapids × Conventional, T6 = Iceberg × Conventional). In the organic fertilization method only well decomposed cow dung at the rate of 50 t ha-1 was applied and in the conventional fertilization method- Urea, TSP, MOP and well decomposed cow dung was applied at the rate of 250 kg ha-1, 150 kg ha-1, 200 kg ha-1 and 15 t ha-1 respectively (Moniruzzaman 2002). Urea was used as a top dressing in two equal installments at 12 and 24 days after transplanting (DAT) in the case of the conventional growth method. Only well-decomposed cow manure (50 t ha-1) was used in the organic growth approach. The GAU meteorological station provided the distribution of average monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, relative humidity, and rainfall during the crop growing season, which is shown in Suppl. material 1: table SS1. Three replications of the field experiment were carried out using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). The experimental plot was 108 m2 in total, measuring 13.5 m in length and 8 m in width. Three equal blocks were created from the entire region. Each block was split up into six plots, each with a random distribution of six treatment combinations. The experiment included a total of eighteen-unit plots. Each plot was 2 m by 1.5 m. Two blocks and two plots were kept 70 cm and 50 cm apart, respectively. Plots were elevated to a height of 10 cm. Row to row and plant to plant spacing in the plot was maintained at 25 cm and 40 cm, respectively. Intercultural tasks like irrigation, mulching, and gap filling were carried out as needed. With the exception of yields, which were recorded plot-wise, ten plants were chosen at random from the middle rows of the unit plot to avoid the border effect. To evaluate plant development, yield characteristics, and yields as impacted by various treatment combinations, data on a variety of parameters were gathered. At 15, 25, and 35 days after transplanting (DAT), data were gathered on plant height, leaf length, leaf breadth, number of leaves per plant, and total leaf area per plant. Total yield (t ha-1), leaf yield per plant (kg), and leaf yield per plot (kg) were determined and calculated at final harvest. The “Statistix 10” program was used to statistically analyze the gathered data (Statistix 2021). The Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD at 5%) was used to examine the mean differences between the treatments after calculating the mean values for each treatment and conducting an analysis of variance for each variable (Gomez and Gomez 1984). Economic analysis was done in order to compare the profitability of the treatment combination. Values of Gross return, Net return and Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) were calculated in accordance with the formula by Chowhan et al. 2021, 2022a. The details of Cost of production (Input cost) and Overhead costings are described in Suppl. material 1: tables S2, S3.

Results

Assessment of the growth patterns revealed distinct differences in leaf development and biomass accumulation across the genotypes. Table 1 provides a comprehensive overview of the descriptive statistics for these leaf-related traits and final yield attributes.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for growth parameters and yield attributes of lettuce cultivars.

Variable(s) Overall mean CV (%) Std. Error (SE) Range (Min–Max)
Plant height at 15 DAT (cm) 14.03 4.9 0.4 12.90–15.79
Plant height at 25 DAT (cm) 18.15 3.25 0.34 15.86–20.29
Plant height at 35 DAT (cm) 20.37 5.06 0.6 18.95–22.52
Number of leaves at 15 DAT 6.01 8.5 0.29 5.48–6.67
Number of leaves at 25 DAT 10.63 6.51 0.4 10.19–10.87
Number of leaves at 35 DAT 15.75 4.79 0.44 13.48–16.90
Leaf length at 15 DAT (cm) 11.75 5.44 0.37 10.99–12.55
Leaf length at 25 DAT (cm) 14.98 1.97 0.17 13.67–16.71
Leaf length at 35 DAT (cm) 16.5 2.96 0.28 15.43–17.38
Leaf breadth at 15 DAT (cm) 9.05 6.07 0.32 8.52–9.55
Leaf breadth at 25 DAT (cm) 13.83 3.48 0.28 12.90–14.81
Leaf breadth at 35 DAT (cm) 16.22 6.08 0.57 15.43–17.29
Total leaf area at 15 DAT (cm2) 193.27 8.8 9.82 148.00–222.64
Total leaf area at 25 DAT (cm2) 546.41 6.1 19.24 489.82–635.68
Total leaf area at 35 DAT (cm2) 666.73 7.38 28.41 618.54–742.25
Yield per plant (kg) 0.26 7.61 0.011 0.22–0.31
Yield per plot (kg) 7.85 7.61 0.35 6.60–9.30
Total Yield (t ha-1) 26.33 7.61 1.16 22.00–31.00

Growth responses of lettuce cultivars under different fertilization regimes

Plant height of lettuce was significantly affected by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table 2). At 15 DAT, the tallest plants were observed in C1G0 (15.79 cm), which was statistically comparable to C1G1 (14.60 cm). The shortest plants occurred in C2G1 (12.90 cm), statistically similar to C2G0 (13.17 cm) and C3G1 (13.49 cm). At 25 DAT, C1G0 produced the tallest plants (20.29 cm), whereas C2G1 resulted in the lowest plant height (15.86 cm) and was significantly inferior to all other treatments. A similar trend was observed at 35 DAT, where C1G0 recorded the maximum height (22.52 cm), statistically comparable to C1G1 (21.86 cm). The shortest plants were obtained from C3G0 (18.95 cm), which did not differ significantly from other treatments except C1G0 and C1G1.

Table 2.

Interaction effects of cultivar and fertilization on leaf production of lettuce.

Treatment combinations Plant height (cm) at Number of leaves per plant at
15DAT 25DAT 35DAT 15DAT 25DAT 35DAT
C1G0 15.79 a 20.29 a 22.52 a 5.62 b 10.71 16.67 a
C2G0 13.17 cd 17.43 c 19.57 bc 6.05 ab 10.87 16.57 a
C3G0 14.21 bc 18.67 b 18.95 c 6.62 a 10.76 13.48 b
C1G1 14.60 ab 18.71 b 21.86 ab 5.62 b 10.71 16.90 a
C2G1 12.90 d 15.86 d 19.14 c 5.48 b 10.19 16.43 a
C3G1 13.49 bcd 17.91 bc 20.19 bc 6.67 a 10.52 14.43 b
HSD (5%) 1.95 1.67 2.93 1.45 1.96 2.14

The number of leaves per plant was significantly influenced by treatments at 15 and 35 DAT, but not at 25 DAT (Table 2). At 15 DAT, the highest leaf number was recorded in C3G1 (6.67), which was statistically similar to C3G0 (6.62) and C2G0 (6.05). The lowest leaf number was observed in C2G1 (5.48), which was statistically comparable to C1G0, C1G1, and C2G0. At 25 DAT, the highest number of leaves was recorded in C2G0 (10.76), though differences among treatments were not significant. At 35 DAT, C1G1 produced the maximum number of leaves (16.90), statistically similar to C1G0, C2G0, and C2G1, while the lowest leaf number was observed in C3G0 (13.48), which did not differ significantly from C3G1.

Lettuce cultivars’ responses to different fertilization type in terms of leaf size

Leaf length of lettuce was significantly influenced by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table 3). At 15 DAT, the highest leaf length was recorded in C1G0 (12.55 cm), which did not differ significantly from other treatments except C2G1. At 25 DAT, C1G0 again produced the longest leaves (16.71 cm), significantly exceeding all other treatment combinations, while the shortest leaves were observed in C2G1 (13.67 cm). At 35 DAT, maximum leaf length was recorded in C1G1 (17.38 cm), which was statistically comparable to C1G0, C3G0, and C3G1. In contrast, both C2G0 and C2G1 produced the shortest leaves (15.43 cm).

Table 3.

Combined influence of cultivar and fertilization on leaf size of lettuce.

Treatment combinations Leaf length (cm) at Leaf breadth (cm) at
15DAT 25DAT 35DAT 15DAT 25DAT 35DAT
C1G0 12.55 a 16.71 a 17.33 a 9.33 ab 14.33 a 15.90 ab
C2G0 11.50 ab 14.38 c 15.43 b 9.55 a 13.38 bc 15.43 b
C3G0 12.12 a 15.14 b 16.52 a 9.26 ab 14.81 a 15.95 ab
C1G1 11.71 ab 15.14 b 17.38 a 8.86 ab 13.38 bc 17.19 ab
C2G1 10.99 b 13.67 d 15.43 b 8.79 ab 12.90 bc 15.57 ab
C3G1 11.62 ab 14.81 bc 16.90 a 8.52 b 14.19 ab 17.29 a
HSD (5%) 1.78 0.82 1.37 1.54 1.35 2.78

Leaf breadth was also significantly affected by the cultivar × fertilization interaction (Table 2). At 15 DAT, the greatest leaf breadth was observed in C2G0 (9.55 cm), statistically similar to all treatments except C3G1, which produced the narrowest leaves (8.52 cm). At 25 DAT, C3G0 recorded the highest leaf breadth (14.81 cm), comparable to C1G0 and C3G1, while the lowest value was found in C2G1 (12.90 cm). At 35 DAT, maximum leaf breadth occurred in C3G1 (17.29 cm), which differed significantly only from C2G0. The lowest leaf breadth was recorded in C2G0 (15.43 cm).

Response of lettuce leaf area to cultivar and fertilization

Total leaf area of lettuce was significantly affected by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table 4). At 15 DAT, the highest leaf area was recorded in C1G0 (222.64 cm2), which was statistically comparable to C2G0 (209.21 cm2) and C1G1 (204.96 cm2). The lowest leaf area at this stage was observed in C3G1 (148.00 cm2). At 25 DAT, C1G0 produced the maximum total leaf area per plant (635.68 cm2), whereas the minimum was recorded in C2G1 (489.82 cm2), which was statistically similar to C3G0 and C3G1. At 35 DAT, the highest leaf area was obtained from C1G1 (742.25 cm2), statistically comparable to C3G1 and C2G0. In contrast, the lowest leaf area was recorded in C3G0 (618.54 cm2), which did not differ significantly from C1G0, C2G0, and C2G1.

Table 4.

Interaction effect of cultivars and fertilization methods on total leaf area of lettuce.

Treatment combinations Total leaf area (cm2) at
15DAT 25DAT 35DAT
C1G0 222.64 a 635.68 a 628.75 c
C2G0 209.21 ab 554.93 bc 654.71 abc
C3G0 191.68 b 496.43 cd 618.54 c
C1G1 204.96 ab 570.71 b 742.25 a
C2G1 183.14 b 489.82 d 633.89 bc
C3G1 148.00 c 530.86 bcd 722.25 ab
HSD (5%) 47.91 94.13 138.31

Yield performance

Yield per plant, yield per plot, and yield per hectare were significantly influenced by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table 5). The highest yield per plant (0.31 kg) was recorded in C3G1, while the lowest yield was observed in C1G0 (0.22 kg), which was statistically similar to C2G0 (0.24 kg). Total yield per plot followed a similar trend, with the maximum yield obtained from C3G1 (9.30 kg) and the minimum from C1G0 (6.60 kg), statistically comparable to C2G0 (7.20 kg). On a hectare basis, C3G1 produced the highest yield (31 t ha-1), whereas the lowest yield was recorded in C1G0 (22 t ha-1), followed by C2G0 (24 t ha-1).

Table 5.

Interaction effect of cultivars and fertilization methods on leaf yield at harvest of lettuce.

Treatment Yield/plant (kg) Yield/plot (kg) Yield (t ha-1)
C1G0 0.22 c 6.60 c 22.00 c
C2G0 0.24 bc 7.20 bc 24.00 bc
C3G0 0.27 b 8.00 b 27.00 b
C1G1 0.27 b 8.00 b 27.00 b
C2G1 0.27 b 8.00 b 27.00 b
C3G1 0.31 a 9.30 a 31.00 a
HSD (5%) 0.05 1.68 5.59

Economic analysis

The benefit-cost ratio was the highest (1.84) in the treatment C3G0 (cultivar: Iceberg with organic method) (Table 6) and the second and third highest benefit-cost ratio (1.69 and 1.59) were found in the treatments C3G1 and C2G0. The lowest (1.47) benefit-cost ratio was recorded from C2G1 (Cultivar: Grand Rapids with conventional method) and C1G1 (Green wave with conventional method). From the economic point of view, the above results indicated that treatment C3G0 (cultivar: Iceberg with organic method) was more profitable than the other treatments for the lettuce production.

Table 6.

Cost and return analysis of lettuce production under different treatment combinations.

Treatment combination Marketable yield (t ha-1) Gross return (BDT) Cost of production (BDT) Net return (BDT) BCR
C1G0 22 122,826 82,000 40,826 1.50
C2G0 24 133,992 82,500 51,492 1.59
C3G0 27 150,741 82,000 68,741 1.84
C1G1 27 124,848 84,400 40,448 1.47
C2G1 27 124,848 84,900 39,948 1.47
C3G1 31 143,344 84,400 58,944 1.69

Discussion

The above finding makes it clear that larger levels of organic fertilizers, especially well-decomposed cow dung, have a positive impact on lettuce plant height at harvest. Throughout the growing phase, organic fertilizers could have accelerated the nitrogen mineralization process and ensured the slow but consistent release of vital nutrients, which may have raised the synthesis of carbohydrates, improved growth, and ultimately increased the height of the plant at harvest. Islam et al. (2012) discovered that environmentally friendly organic fertilizer improved lettuce growth and yield, after using synthetic fertilizers and a control. The superior performance of Iceberg lettuce in terms of yield under conventional fertilization aligns with earlier reports indicating that crisphead lettuce types respond strongly to readily available nitrogen sources (Polat et al. 2008; Masarirambi et al. 2012). Conventional fertilizers provide immediate nutrient availability, which enhances vegetative growth and biomass accumulation. In contrast, organic fertilization improved plant height and sustained leaf growth, particularly in Green Wave, suggesting a gradual nutrient release pattern that supports steady growth (Chowdhury and Rahman 2021). Similar findings were reported by Islam et al. (2012) and Asaduzzaman et al. (2010), who noted improved soil structure and microbial activity under organic amendments. The economic superiority of organic Iceberg lettuce reflects increasing consumer willingness to pay higher prices for organically produced vegetables. Studies by Reganold and Wachter (2016) and Seufert et al. (2012) also emphasized that organic systems, despite slightly lower yields, can remain profitable due to reduced external inputs and price premiums. Overall, the interaction between cultivar genetics and nutrient management practices plays a crucial role in determining lettuce productivity and profitability (Chowhan et al. 2022b). Selecting appropriate cultivars for specific fertilization systems is therefore essential for sustainable vegetable production (Al-Fuad et al. 2025).

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that lettuce growth, yield and profitability are significantly influenced by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method. Iceberg emerged as the most productive cultivar under both fertilization systems, achieving maximum yield under conventional fertilization and highest economic return under organic management. Considering yield stability, profitability and consumer preference for organic produce, organic cultivation of Iceberg lettuce appears to be a sustainable and economically viable option for farmers in Bangladesh. Adoption of suitable cultivar–fertilization combinations can substantially improve lettuce productivity and farm income while supporting environmentally friendly agricultural practices.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: NA. Investigation and Validation: NA, MNN and MSR. Data curation: SC. Formal analysis: NA. Editing, final draft preparation and revision: SC. Supervision: EK, MSA and MSR.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) use

The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.

Artificial intelligence tools were used solely for language editing, including grammar and error checking. All content was reviewed by the authors, and only relevant and verified information was retained.

References

  • Al-Fuad AK, Akther S, Zakaria M, Swapon MAH, Chowhan S, Roni MS (2025) BARI Tomato-19 as a promising cultivar: A comparative study of growth, quality, and yield attributes. Madras Agricultural Journal 112: 172–183. https://doi.org/10.29321/maj.10.901268
  • Ahmed F, Islam M, Rahman MM, Chowhan S, Bhuiyan MSH, Kader M (2022) Effect of long term manuring and fertilization on carbon sequestration in terrace soil. Agricultural Science Digest – A Research Journal 42(1): 14–19. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.d-315
  • Asaduzzaman MD, Shamima S, Arfan MD (2010) Combined effect of mulch materials and organic manure on the growth and yield of lettuce. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Science 9: 504–508.
  • Chowdhury S, Rahman M (2021) Influence of different organic manures on growth, yield and mineral nutrient accumulation in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v30i2.54642
  • Chowhan S (2021b) Impact of agro technology on socio-economic condition of the farming groups at Jagannathpur. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology 14(1): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.01.2021.11
  • Chowhan S, Ghosh SR, Chowhan T, Hasan MM, Roni MS (2016) Climate change and crop production challenges: An overview. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries 3(2): 251–269. https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v3i2.29346
  • Chowhan S, Ghosh SR, Hoque MI, Islam M, Nabi KME (2021) Yield and profitability analysis of pulse and oil seed based cropping patterns against Aman-Boro-fallow cropping systems in Magura. Agricultural Science Digest 41(1): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-261
  • Chowhan S, Islam M, Rahman M, Rana MS, Islam MA, Islam S (2022a) Four crops pattern for greater economic return and productivity. Current Research in Agriculture and Farming 3(1): 7–15.
  • Chowhan S, Islam M, Nahar K, Ali MKJ, Husain MM (2022b) No tillage cultivation of mustard requires definite boron dose for optimizing seed yield. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 34(1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i130879
  • Dhakal K, Nandwani D (2022) Growth and yield responses of leafy vegetables grown in organic and conventional agriculture systems. Organic Farming 8(1): 3–8. https://doi.org/10.12924/of2022.08010003
  • Fajdetić NR, Božić Ostojić L, Benković R, Zima D, Blažinkov M, Mirosavljević K, Popović B, Benković-Lačić T (2025) Effects of three organic fertilizers and biostimulants on the morphological traits and secondary metabolite content of lettuce. Horticulturae 11(11): 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111288
  • García-Rández A, Orden L, Sánchez-Méndez S, Andreu-Rodríguez FJ, Sáez-Tovar JA, Martínez-Sabater E, Bustamante M de los Á, Pérez-Murcia MD, Moral R (2025) Comparative evaluation of organic and synthetic fertilizers on lettuce yield and metabolomic profiles. Horticulturae 11(12): 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121421
  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons Publication, New York, 202–215.
  • Islam MS, Rahman MM, Hossain MA (2012) Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of lettuce. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 37(3): 485–494
  • Jannat SA, Haque MA, Nahar K, Ali MKJ, Chowhan S, Hossian MM, Rahman MH (2023) Integrated effect of vermicompost and chemical fertilizers on the yield & yield contributing characteristics of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research 23(4): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaar/2023/v23i4477
  • Masarirambi MT, Dlamini P, Wahome PK, Oseni TO (2012) Effects of chicken manure on growth, yield and quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) ‘Taina’ under a lath house in a semi-arid sub-tropical environment. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 12(3): 399–406.
  • Moniruzzaman M (2002) Plant density, age of seedling and nitrogen, phosphorus fertilizers effects in lettuce. MS thesis, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Agricultural University, Gazipur, 34 pp.
  • Nahar K, Haque MA, Chowhan S, Ali MKJ, Husain MM, Rahman MM (2021) Combined effect of vermicompost and inorganic fertilizer on yield and yield contributing Characters of Tomato Plant. Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 8(1): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2021/v8i130124
  • Polat E, Demir H, Onus AN (2008) Comparison of some yield and quality criteria in organically and conventionally-grown lettuce. African Journal of Biotechnology 7(9): 1235–1239.
  • Snowdon AL (2001) Lettuce, chicory and endive. In: ‘Color Atlas of post-harvest Diseases and Disorders of Fruits and Vegetables, Volume 2: Vegetables. CRC press, 196 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18215
  • Statistix (2021) Data analysis software for researchers (Version 10.0). Analytical Software, 2105 Miller Landing Rd, Tallahassee Florida 32312, USA.
  • Virgine Tenshia JS, Singram P (2005) Influence of humic acid application on yield, nutrient availability and iron uptake in tomatoes. Madras Agricultural Journal 92: 670–676.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Growth, yield and profitability of lettuce cultivars with various type of fertilizer application. The GAU meteorological station provided the distribution of average monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, relative humidity, and rainfall during the crop growing season, which is shown in this file. Moreover, the details of Cost of production (Input cost) and Overhead costings are described. (.docx file)

Download file (23.15 kb)
login to comment