Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Md. Shyduzzaman Roni ( roni@gau.edu.bd ) Academic editor: TURGAY AKUNAL
© 2026 Nazma Akter, Md. Nur Nabi, Sushan Chowhan, Emrul Kayesh, Mohammad Saiful Alam, Md. Shyduzzaman Roni.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Akter N, Nabi MdN, Chowhan S, Kayesh E, Alam MS, Roni MdS (2026) Organic versus conventional fertilization: impacts on growth, yield and profitability of lettuce cultivars. Innovations in Agriculture 9: e183987. https://doi.org/10.3897/ia.2026.183987
|
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is an increasingly popular leafy vegetable in Bangladesh due to its high nutritional value and growing consumer preference for fresh salads. However, productivity remains low compared to major lettuce-producing countries like China and USA, largely because of inadequate cultivar selection and suboptimal nutrient management. The current study was carried out at Gazipur Agricultural University in Bangladesh during the winter to assess the growth performance, yield potential, and economic viability of three lettuce cultivars viz. Green Wave, Grand Rapids, and Iceberg under organic and conventional fertilization systems. Three cultivars and two fertilization techniques were combined in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Evaluations of yield, profitability, and growth characteristics (plant height, quantity, size, and area of leaves) were observed and analyzed. Results revealed significant interaction effects between cultivar and fertilization method for most growth and yield parameters. The Iceberg cultivar produced the highest marketable yield under conventional fertilization (31.0 t ha-1), while organic fertilization enhanced plant height and leaf area in Green Wave. Economic analysis indicated that Iceberg grown under organic fertilization provided the highest benefit-cost ratio (1.84), owing to premium market prices and lower input costs. Overall, the study demonstrates that cultivar choice strongly influences lettuce performance under different fertilization systems, and that organic cultivation of Iceberg lettuce offers a profitable and sustainable option for Bangladeshi farmers.
Conventional fertilization, growth, lettuce BCR, organic fertilization, yield
Among salad crops, lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is the most widely used and takes up the greatest space worldwide. It is a member of Asteraceae, the biggest dicotyledonous family (formerly Compositae). It is a tall, milky-juiced annual leafy herb. Early in the season, it grows a short stem and a cluster of leaves that, depending on the variety, vary greatly in shape, character, and color. It is widely acknowledged that Europe and Asia are where it first appeared in the New World (
The lettuce is perfectly suited to Bangladesh’s Rabi season. In comparison to other nations that cultivate lettuce, such as Italy (73.5 t ha-1), Japan (58.6 t ha-1), and India (108.9 t ha-1), this country’s lettuce farming is restricted to a very small area with minimal production and an average yield of only 4.0 t ha-1 (
The experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm of Gazipur Agricultural University (GAU), Salna, Gazipur during the winter season. The cultivar of lettuce used in this experiment was the Green Wave, Grand Rapids and Iceberg were collected from the market of Siddique Bazar of Dhaka. The experiment comprised of six treatments (T1 = Green Wave × Organic, T2 = Grand Rapids × Organic, T3 = Iceberg × Organic, T4 = Green Wave × Conventional, T5 = Grand Rapids × Conventional, T6 = Iceberg × Conventional). In the organic fertilization method only well decomposed cow dung at the rate of 50 t ha-1 was applied and in the conventional fertilization method- Urea, TSP, MOP and well decomposed cow dung was applied at the rate of 250 kg ha-1, 150 kg ha-1, 200 kg ha-1 and 15 t ha-1 respectively (
Assessment of the growth patterns revealed distinct differences in leaf development and biomass accumulation across the genotypes. Table
Descriptive statistics for growth parameters and yield attributes of lettuce cultivars.
| Variable(s) | Overall mean | CV (%) | Std. Error (SE) | Range (Min–Max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height at 15 DAT (cm) | 14.03 | 4.9 | 0.4 | 12.90–15.79 |
| Plant height at 25 DAT (cm) | 18.15 | 3.25 | 0.34 | 15.86–20.29 |
| Plant height at 35 DAT (cm) | 20.37 | 5.06 | 0.6 | 18.95–22.52 |
| Number of leaves at 15 DAT | 6.01 | 8.5 | 0.29 | 5.48–6.67 |
| Number of leaves at 25 DAT | 10.63 | 6.51 | 0.4 | 10.19–10.87 |
| Number of leaves at 35 DAT | 15.75 | 4.79 | 0.44 | 13.48–16.90 |
| Leaf length at 15 DAT (cm) | 11.75 | 5.44 | 0.37 | 10.99–12.55 |
| Leaf length at 25 DAT (cm) | 14.98 | 1.97 | 0.17 | 13.67–16.71 |
| Leaf length at 35 DAT (cm) | 16.5 | 2.96 | 0.28 | 15.43–17.38 |
| Leaf breadth at 15 DAT (cm) | 9.05 | 6.07 | 0.32 | 8.52–9.55 |
| Leaf breadth at 25 DAT (cm) | 13.83 | 3.48 | 0.28 | 12.90–14.81 |
| Leaf breadth at 35 DAT (cm) | 16.22 | 6.08 | 0.57 | 15.43–17.29 |
| Total leaf area at 15 DAT (cm2) | 193.27 | 8.8 | 9.82 | 148.00–222.64 |
| Total leaf area at 25 DAT (cm2) | 546.41 | 6.1 | 19.24 | 489.82–635.68 |
| Total leaf area at 35 DAT (cm2) | 666.73 | 7.38 | 28.41 | 618.54–742.25 |
| Yield per plant (kg) | 0.26 | 7.61 | 0.011 | 0.22–0.31 |
| Yield per plot (kg) | 7.85 | 7.61 | 0.35 | 6.60–9.30 |
| Total Yield (t ha-1) | 26.33 | 7.61 | 1.16 | 22.00–31.00 |
Plant height of lettuce was significantly affected by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table
Interaction effects of cultivar and fertilization on leaf production of lettuce.
| Treatment combinations | Plant height (cm) at | Number of leaves per plant at | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15DAT | 25DAT | 35DAT | 15DAT | 25DAT | 35DAT | |
| C1G0 | 15.79 a | 20.29 a | 22.52 a | 5.62 b | 10.71 | 16.67 a |
| C2G0 | 13.17 cd | 17.43 c | 19.57 bc | 6.05 ab | 10.87 | 16.57 a |
| C3G0 | 14.21 bc | 18.67 b | 18.95 c | 6.62 a | 10.76 | 13.48 b |
| C1G1 | 14.60 ab | 18.71 b | 21.86 ab | 5.62 b | 10.71 | 16.90 a |
| C2G1 | 12.90 d | 15.86 d | 19.14 c | 5.48 b | 10.19 | 16.43 a |
| C3G1 | 13.49 bcd | 17.91 bc | 20.19 bc | 6.67 a | 10.52 | 14.43 b |
| HSD (5%) | 1.95 | 1.67 | 2.93 | 1.45 | 1.96 | 2.14 |
The number of leaves per plant was significantly influenced by treatments at 15 and 35 DAT, but not at 25 DAT (Table
Leaf length of lettuce was significantly influenced by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table
Combined influence of cultivar and fertilization on leaf size of lettuce.
| Treatment combinations | Leaf length (cm) at | Leaf breadth (cm) at | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15DAT | 25DAT | 35DAT | 15DAT | 25DAT | 35DAT | |
| C1G0 | 12.55 a | 16.71 a | 17.33 a | 9.33 ab | 14.33 a | 15.90 ab |
| C2G0 | 11.50 ab | 14.38 c | 15.43 b | 9.55 a | 13.38 bc | 15.43 b |
| C3G0 | 12.12 a | 15.14 b | 16.52 a | 9.26 ab | 14.81 a | 15.95 ab |
| C1G1 | 11.71 ab | 15.14 b | 17.38 a | 8.86 ab | 13.38 bc | 17.19 ab |
| C2G1 | 10.99 b | 13.67 d | 15.43 b | 8.79 ab | 12.90 bc | 15.57 ab |
| C3G1 | 11.62 ab | 14.81 bc | 16.90 a | 8.52 b | 14.19 ab | 17.29 a |
| HSD (5%) | 1.78 | 0.82 | 1.37 | 1.54 | 1.35 | 2.78 |
Leaf breadth was also significantly affected by the cultivar × fertilization interaction (Table
Total leaf area of lettuce was significantly affected by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table
Interaction effect of cultivars and fertilization methods on total leaf area of lettuce.
| Treatment combinations | Total leaf area (cm2) at | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 15DAT | 25DAT | 35DAT | |
| C1G0 | 222.64 a | 635.68 a | 628.75 c |
| C2G0 | 209.21 ab | 554.93 bc | 654.71 abc |
| C3G0 | 191.68 b | 496.43 cd | 618.54 c |
| C1G1 | 204.96 ab | 570.71 b | 742.25 a |
| C2G1 | 183.14 b | 489.82 d | 633.89 bc |
| C3G1 | 148.00 c | 530.86 bcd | 722.25 ab |
| HSD (5%) | 47.91 | 94.13 | 138.31 |
Yield per plant, yield per plot, and yield per hectare were significantly influenced by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method (Table
Interaction effect of cultivars and fertilization methods on leaf yield at harvest of lettuce.
| Treatment | Yield/plant (kg) | Yield/plot (kg) | Yield (t ha-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1G0 | 0.22 c | 6.60 c | 22.00 c |
| C2G0 | 0.24 bc | 7.20 bc | 24.00 bc |
| C3G0 | 0.27 b | 8.00 b | 27.00 b |
| C1G1 | 0.27 b | 8.00 b | 27.00 b |
| C2G1 | 0.27 b | 8.00 b | 27.00 b |
| C3G1 | 0.31 a | 9.30 a | 31.00 a |
| HSD (5%) | 0.05 | 1.68 | 5.59 |
The benefit-cost ratio was the highest (1.84) in the treatment C3G0 (cultivar: Iceberg with organic method) (Table
Cost and return analysis of lettuce production under different treatment combinations.
| Treatment combination | Marketable yield (t ha-1) | Gross return (BDT) | Cost of production (BDT) | Net return (BDT) | BCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1G0 | 22 | 122,826 | 82,000 | 40,826 | 1.50 |
| C2G0 | 24 | 133,992 | 82,500 | 51,492 | 1.59 |
| C3G0 | 27 | 150,741 | 82,000 | 68,741 | 1.84 |
| C1G1 | 27 | 124,848 | 84,400 | 40,448 | 1.47 |
| C2G1 | 27 | 124,848 | 84,900 | 39,948 | 1.47 |
| C3G1 | 31 | 143,344 | 84,400 | 58,944 | 1.69 |
The above finding makes it clear that larger levels of organic fertilizers, especially well-decomposed cow dung, have a positive impact on lettuce plant height at harvest. Throughout the growing phase, organic fertilizers could have accelerated the nitrogen mineralization process and ensured the slow but consistent release of vital nutrients, which may have raised the synthesis of carbohydrates, improved growth, and ultimately increased the height of the plant at harvest.
The study demonstrates that lettuce growth, yield and profitability are significantly influenced by the interaction between cultivar and fertilization method. Iceberg emerged as the most productive cultivar under both fertilization systems, achieving maximum yield under conventional fertilization and highest economic return under organic management. Considering yield stability, profitability and consumer preference for organic produce, organic cultivation of Iceberg lettuce appears to be a sustainable and economically viable option for farmers in Bangladesh. Adoption of suitable cultivar–fertilization combinations can substantially improve lettuce productivity and farm income while supporting environmentally friendly agricultural practices.
Conceptualization: NA. Investigation and Validation: NA, MNN and MSR. Data curation: SC. Formal analysis: NA. Editing, final draft preparation and revision: SC. Supervision: EK, MSA and MSR.
The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.
Artificial intelligence tools were used solely for language editing, including grammar and error checking. All content was reviewed by the authors, and only relevant and verified information was retained.
Growth, yield and profitability of lettuce cultivars with various type of fertilizer application. The GAU meteorological station provided the distribution of average monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, relative humidity, and rainfall during the crop growing season, which is shown in this file. Moreover, the details of Cost of production (Input cost) and Overhead costings are described. (.docx file)